|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Recovery periods restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone
1 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA and
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomechanics and Biomaterials Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
*e-mail: arobling{at}anatomy.iupui.edu
Accepted July 29, 2001
Bone cells are capable of sensing and responding to mechanical forces, but mechanosensitivity begins to decline soon after the stimulus is initiated. Under continued stimulation, bone is desensitized to mechanical stimuli. We sought to determine the amount of time required to restore mechanosensitivity to desensitized bone cells in vivo by manipulating the recovery time (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 or 8 h) allowed between four identical daily loading bouts. We also investigated the osteogenic effectiveness of shorter-term recovery periods, lasting several seconds (0.5, 3.5, 7 or 14 s), introduced between each of 36 identical daily loading cycles. Using the rat tibia four-point bending model, the right tibia of 144 adult female Sprague-Dawley rats was subjected to bending, sham bending or no loading. In the rats receiving recovery periods between loading bouts, histomorphometric measurements from the endocortical surface of the loaded and nonloaded control (left) tibiae revealed more than 100 % higher relative bone formation rates in the 8 h recovery group than in the 0 and 0.5 h recovery groups. Approximately 8 h of recovery was sufficient to restore full mechanosensitivity to the cells. In the rats allowed time to recover between load cycles, 14 s of recovery resulted in significantly higher (66–190 %) relative bone formation rates compared to any of the three shorter recovery periods. In both experiments, bone formation in the sham-bending animals was similar to that in the nonloaded control group. The results demonstrate the importance of recovery periods for (i) restoring mechanosensitivity to bone cells and (ii) maximizing the osteogenic effects of mechanical loading (exercise) regimens.
Key words: resensitization, recovery, mechanical loading, histomorphometry, bone adaptation.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. M. Middleton, S. A. Kelly, and T. Garland Jr Selective breeding as a tool to probe skeletal response to high voluntary locomotor activity in mice Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2008; 48(3): 394 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. R. Forwood Physical activity and bone development during childhood: insights from animal models J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 334 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Nakao, T. Goto, K.K. Gunjigake, T. Konoo, S. Kobayashi, and K. Yamaguchi Intermittent Force Induces High RANKL Expression in Human Periodontal Ligament Cells Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2007; 86(7): 623 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Srinivasan, B. J. Ausk, S. L. Poliachik, S. E. Warner, T. S. Richardson, and T. S. Gross Rest-inserted loading rapidly amplifies the response of bone to small increases in strain and load cycles J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2007; 102(5): 1945 - 1952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. S Deshpande, R. M McMeeking, and A. G Evans A model for the contractility of the cytoskeleton including the effects of stress-fibre formation and dissociation Proc R Soc A, March 8, 2007; 463(2079): 787 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Magra, S. Hughes, A. J. El Haj, and N. Maffulli VOCCs and TREK-1 ion channel expression in human tenocytes Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): C1053 - C1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. L. Nichols, N. Zhang, and X. Wen Proteomics and genomics of microgravity Physiol Genomics, September 14, 2006; 26(3): 163 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kato, T. Terashima, T. Yamashita, Y. Hatanaka, A. Honda, and Y. Umemura Effect of low-repetition jump training on bone mineral density in young women J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2006; 100(3): 839 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H A McKay, L MacLean, M Petit, K MacKelvie-O'Brien, P Janssen, T Beck, and K M Khan "Bounce at the Bell": a novel program of short bouts of exercise improves proximal femur bone mass in early pubertal children Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2005; 39(8): 521 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C H Turner and A G Robling Exercises for improving bone strength Br. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2005; 39(4): 188 - 189. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. LaMothe and R. F. Zernicke Rest insertion combined with high-frequency loading enhances osteogenesis J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1788 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Umemura, N. Sogo, and A. Honda Effects of intervals between jumps or bouts on osteogenic response to loading J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2002; 93(4): 1345 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
