QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pace, C. M. Articles by Westneat, M. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pace, C. M. Articles by Westneat, M. W.

The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 3261-3271 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Comparative kinematics of the forelimb during swimming in red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta) and spiny softshell (Apalone spinifera) turtles

Cinnamon M. Pace, Richard W. Blob^* and Mark W. Westneat

Department of Zoology, Division of Fishes, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA

*Author for correspondence (e-mail: rblob{at}fmnh.org)

Accepted July 2, 2001

Softshell turtles (Family Trionychidae) possess extensive webbing between the digits of the manus, suggesting that the forelimb may serve as an effective thrust generator during aquatic locomotion. However, the hindlimb has previously been viewed as the dominant propulsive organ in swimming freshwater turtles. To evaluate the potential role of the forelimb in thrust production during swimming in freshwater turtles, we compared the forelimb morphology and three-dimensional forelimb kinematics of a highly aquatic trionychid turtle, the spiny softshell Apalone spinifera, and a morphologically generalized emydid turtle, the red-eared slider Trachemys scripta. Spiny softshells possess nearly twice as much forelimb surface area as sliders for generating drag-based thrust. In addition, although both species use drag-based propulsion, several aspects of forelimb kinematics differ significantly between these species. During the thrust phase of the forelimb cycle, spiny softshells hold the elbow and wrist joints significantly straighter than sliders, thereby further increasing the surface area of the limb that can move water posteriorly and increasing the velocity of the distal portion of the forelimb. These aspects of swimming kinematics in softshells should increase forelimb thrust production and suggest that the forelimbs make more substantial contributions to forward thrust in softshell turtles than in sliders. Spiny softshells also restrict forelimb movements to a much narrower dorsoventral and anteroposterior range than sliders throughout the stroke, thereby helping to minimize limb movements potentially extraneous to forward thrust production. These comparisons demonstrate considerable diversity in the forelimb kinematics of turtles that swim using rowing motions of the limbs and suggest that the evolution of turtle forelimb mechanics produced a variety of contrasting solutions for aquatic specialization.

Key words: locomotion, biomechanics, kinematics, hydrodynamics, swimming, turtle, spiny softshell, Apalone spinifera, red-eared slider, Trachemys scripta.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Rivera, A. R. V. Rivera, E. E. Dougherty, and R. W. Blob Aquatic turning performance of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and functional consequences of a rigid body design J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4203 - 4213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Ashley-Ross and B. F. Bechtel Kinematics of the transition between aquatic and terrestrial locomotion in the newt Taricha torosa J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 461 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]