QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mezler, M. Articles by Breer, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mezler, M. Articles by Breer, H.

The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 2987-2997 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Characteristic features and ligand specificity of the two olfactory receptor classes from Xenopus laevis

Mario Mezler^1,2, Jörg Fleischer¹ and Heinz Breer^1,*

¹ University of Hohenheim, Institute of Physiology, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany and
² Bayer AG, Agricultural Centre, MWF, Geb. 6240, Monheim, Germany

*Author for correspondence (e-mail: breer{at}uni-hohenheim.de)

Accepted June 25, 2001

Amphibia have two classes of olfactory receptors (ORs), class I (fish-like receptors) and class II (mammalian-like receptors). These two receptor classes correspond to the two classes identified in other vertebrates, and amphibians thus provide a unique opportunity to compare olfactory receptors of both classes in one animal species, without the constraints of evolutionary distance between different vertebrate orders, such as fish and mammals. We therefore identified the complete open reading frames of class I and class II ORs in Xenopus laevis. In addition to allowing a representative comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences between both receptor classes, we were also able to perform differential functional analysis. These studies revealed distinct class-specific motifs, particularly in the extracellular loops 2 and 3, which might be of importance for the interaction with odorants, as well as in the intracellular loops 2 and 3, which might be responsible for interactions with specific G-proteins. The results of functional expression studies in Xenopus oocytes, comparing distinct receptor types, support the idea that class I receptors are activated by water-soluble odorants, whereas class II receptors are activated by volatile compounds.

Key words: olfactory receptor, Xenopus laevis, sequence analysis, oocyte, heterologous expression.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Shi and J. Zhang Comparative genomic analysis identifies an evolutionary shift of vomeronasal receptor gene repertoires in the vertebrate transition from water to land Genome Res., February 1, 2007; 17(2): 166 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Mori, Y. K. Takahashi, K. M. Igarashi, and M. Yamaguchi Maps of Odorant Molecular Features in the Mammalian Olfactory Bulb Physiol Rev, April 1, 2006; 86(2): 409 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Schoenfeld and T. A. Cleland Anatomical Contributions to Odorant Sampling and Representation in Rodents: Zoning in on Sniffing Behavior Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 131 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Niimura and M. Nei From The Cover: Evolutionary dynamics of olfactory receptor genes in fishes and tetrapods PNAS, April 26, 2005; 102(17): 6039 - 6044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Floriano, N. Vaidehi, and W. A. Goddard III Making Sense of Olfaction through Predictions of the 3-D Structure and Function of Olfactory Receptors Chem Senses, May 1, 2004; 29(4): 269 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Manzini and D. Schild Classes and Narrowing Selectivity of Olfactory Receptor Neurons of Xenopus laevis Tadpoles J. Gen. Physiol., January 26, 2004; 123(2): 99 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Niimura and M. Nei Evolution of olfactory receptor genes in the human genome PNAS, October 14, 2003; 100(21): 12235 - 12240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]