|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Flight kinematics of the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) over a wide range of speeds in a wind tunnel
1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK and
2 Department of Animal Ecology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: k.j.park{at}stir.ac.uk)
Accepted May 14, 2001
Two barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) flying in the Lund wind tunnel were filmed using synchronised high-speed cameras to obtain posterior, ventral and lateral views of the birds in horizontal flapping flight. We investigated wingbeat kinematics, body tilt angle, tail spread and angle of attack at speeds of 414ms-1. Wingbeat frequency showed a clear U-shaped relationship with air speed with minima at 8.9ms-1(bird 1) and 8.7ms-1 (bird 2). A method previously used by other authors of estimating the body drag coefficient (CD,par) by obtaining agreement between the calculated minimum power (Vmin) and the observed minimum wingbeat frequency does not appear to be valid in this species, possibly due to upstroke pauses that occur at intermediate and high speeds, causing the apparent wingbeat frequency to be lower. These upstroke pauses represent flap-gliding, which is possibly a way of adjusting the force generated to the requirements at medium and high speeds, similar to the flap-bound mode of flight in other species. Body tilt angle, tail spread and angle of attack all increase with decreasing speed, thereby providing an additional lift surface and suggesting an important aerodynamic function for the tail at low speeds in forward flight. Results from this study indicate the high plasticity in the wingbeat kinematics and use of the tail that birds have available to them in order to adjust the lift and power output required for flight.
Key words: flight, kinematics, wind tunnel, flap-gliding, barn swallow, Hirundo rustica.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Hedenstrom and G. Spedding Beyond robins: aerodynamic analyses of animal flight J R Soc Interface, June 6, 2008; 5(23): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Fontaine, D. Lentink, S. Kranenbarg, U. K. Muller, J. L. van Leeuwen, A. H. Barr, and J. W. Burdick Automated visual tracking for studying the ontogeny of zebrafish swimming J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1305 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Henningsson, G. R. Spedding, and A. Hedenstrom Vortex wake and flight kinematics of a swift in cruising flight in a wind tunnel J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 717 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Rosen, G.R Spedding, and A Hedenstrom Wake structure and wingbeat kinematics of a house-martin Delichon urbica J R Soc Interface, August 22, 2007; 4(15): 659 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Warrick, C. J. Clark, D. R. Powers, T. L. Hedrick, G. A. Hyder, and A. A. Biewener Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2368 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. M. L. Norberg and Y. Winter Wing beat kinematics of a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, flying at different flight speeds and Strouhal numbers J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2006; 209(19): 3887 - 3897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rosen, G. R. Spedding, and A. Hedenstrom The relationship between wingbeat kinematics and vortex wake of a thrush nightingale J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4255 - 4268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Bullen and N. L. McKenzie Scaling bat wingbeat frequency and amplitude J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2002; 205(17): 2615 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||