spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hedenström, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hedenström, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 2741-2750 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Flight kinematics of the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) over a wide range of speeds in a wind tunnel

Kirsty J. Park1,*, Mikael Rosén2 and Anders Hedenström2

1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK and
2 Department of Animal Ecology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden

*Author for correspondence (e-mail: k.j.park{at}stir.ac.uk)

Accepted May 14, 2001

Two barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) flying in the Lund wind tunnel were filmed using synchronised high-speed cameras to obtain posterior, ventral and lateral views of the birds in horizontal flapping flight. We investigated wingbeat kinematics, body tilt angle, tail spread and angle of attack at speeds of 4–14ms-1. Wingbeat frequency showed a clear U-shaped relationship with air speed with minima at 8.9ms-1(bird 1) and 8.7ms-1 (bird 2). A method previously used by other authors of estimating the body drag coefficient (CD,par) by obtaining agreement between the calculated minimum power (Vmin) and the observed minimum wingbeat frequency does not appear to be valid in this species, possibly due to upstroke pauses that occur at intermediate and high speeds, causing the apparent wingbeat frequency to be lower. These upstroke pauses represent flap-gliding, which is possibly a way of adjusting the force generated to the requirements at medium and high speeds, similar to the flap-bound mode of flight in other species. Body tilt angle, tail spread and angle of attack all increase with decreasing speed, thereby providing an additional lift surface and suggesting an important aerodynamic function for the tail at low speeds in forward flight. Results from this study indicate the high plasticity in the wingbeat kinematics and use of the tail that birds have available to them in order to adjust the lift and power output required for flight.

Key words: flight, kinematics, wind tunnel, flap-gliding, barn swallow, Hirundo rustica.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J R Soc InterfaceHome page
A. Hedenstrom and G. Spedding
Beyond robins: aerodynamic analyses of animal flight
J R Soc Interface, June 6, 2008; 5(23): 595 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. Fontaine, D. Lentink, S. Kranenbarg, U. K. Muller, J. L. van Leeuwen, A. H. Barr, and J. W. Burdick
Automated visual tracking for studying the ontogeny of zebrafish swimming
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1305 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Henningsson, G. R. Spedding, and A. Hedenstrom
Vortex wake and flight kinematics of a swift in cruising flight in a wind tunnel
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 717 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. W. Tobalske
Biomechanics of bird flight
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J R Soc InterfaceHome page
M Rosen, G.R Spedding, and A Hedenstrom
Wake structure and wingbeat kinematics of a house-martin Delichon urbica
J R Soc Interface, August 22, 2007; 4(15): 659 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Warrick, C. J. Clark, D. R. Powers, T. L. Hedrick, G. A. Hyder, and A. A. Biewener
Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2368 - 2382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
U. M. L. Norberg and Y. Winter
Wing beat kinematics of a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, flying at different flight speeds and Strouhal numbers
J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2006; 209(19): 3887 - 3897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Rosen, G. R. Spedding, and A. Hedenstrom
The relationship between wingbeat kinematics and vortex wake of a thrush nightingale
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4255 - 4268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. D. Bullen and N. L. McKenzie
Scaling bat wingbeat frequency and amplitude
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2002; 205(17): 2615 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001