|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
*e-mail: sane{at}socrates.berkeley.edu
Accepted May 18, 2001
We used a dynamically scaled mechanical model of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to study how changes in wing kinematics influence the production of unsteady aerodynamic forces in insect flight. We examined 191 separate sets of kinematic patterns that differed with respect to stroke amplitude, angle of attack, flip timing, flip duration and the shape and magnitude of stroke deviation. Instantaneous aerodynamic forces were measured using a two-dimensional force sensor mounted at the base of the wing. The influence of unsteady rotational effects was assessed by comparing the time course of measured forces with that of corresponding translational quasi-steady estimates. For each pattern, we also calculated mean stroke-averaged values of the force coefficients and an estimate of profile power. The results of this analysis may be divided into four main points.
(i) For a short, symmetrical wing flip, mean lift was optimized by a stroke amplitude of 180° and an angle of attack of 50°. At all stroke amplitudes, mean drag increased monotonically with increasing angle of attack. Translational quasi-steady predictions better matched the measured values at high stroke amplitude than at low stroke amplitude. This discrepancy was due to the increasing importance of rotational mechanisms in kinematic patterns with low stroke amplitude.
(ii) For a 180° stroke amplitude and a 45° angle of attack, lift was maximized by short-duration flips occurring just slightly in advance of stroke reversal. Symmetrical rotations produced similarly high performance. Wing rotation that occurred after stroke reversal, however, produced very low mean lift.
(iii) The production of aerodynamic forces was sensitive to changes in the magnitude of the wing’s deviation from the mean stroke plane (stroke deviation) as well as to the actual shape of the wing tip trajectory. However, in all examples, stroke deviation lowered aerodynamic performance relative to the no deviation case. This attenuation was due, in part, to a trade-off between lift and a radially directed component of total aerodynamic force. Thus, while we found no evidence that stroke deviation can augment lift, it nevertheless may be used to modulate forces on the two wings. Thus, insects might use such changes in wing kinematics during steering maneuvers to generate appropriate force moments.
(iv) While quasi-steady estimates failed to capture the time course of measured lift for nearly all kinematic patterns, they did predict with reasonable accuracy stroke-averaged values for the mean lift coefficient. However, quasi-steady estimates grossly underestimated the magnitude of the mean drag coefficient under all conditions. This discrepancy was due to the contribution of rotational effects that steady-state estimates do not capture. This result suggests that many prior estimates of mechanical power based on wing kinematics may have been grossly underestimated.
Key words: flapping flight, quasi-steady force, unsteady aerodynamics, fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, added mass, delayed stall, rotational circulation, wake capture.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Walker, A. L. R. Thomas, and G. K. Taylor Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies J R Soc Interface, January 6, 2010; 7(42): 131 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Wu, Y. L. Zhang, and M. Sun Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier-Stokes equations J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2009; 212(20): 3313 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Zhao, Q. Huang, X. Deng, and S. P. Sane Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings J R Soc Interface, August 19, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0200v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lentink and M. H. Dickinson Biofluiddynamic scaling of flapping, spinning and translating fins and wings J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2009; 212(16): 2691 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lentink and M. H. Dickinson Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2009; 212(16): 2705 - 2719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M Walker, A. L.R Thomas, and G. K Taylor Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies J R Soc Interface, April 6, 2009; 6(33): 351 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Frazier, J. F. Harrison, S. D. Kirkton, and S. P. Roberts Cold rearing improves cold-flight performance in Drosophila via changes in wing morphology J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2116 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Hesselberg and F.-O. Lehmann Turning behaviour depends on frictional damping in the fruit fly Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4319 - 4334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann and S. Pick The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1362 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Heymann and F.-O. Lehmann The significance of spiracle conductance and spatial arrangement for flight muscle function and aerodynamic performance in flying Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1662 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Dillon and M. R. Frazier Drosophila melanogaster locomotion in cold thin air J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 364 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane Induced airflow in flying insects I. A theoretical model of the induced flow J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 32 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane and N. P. Jacobson Induced airflow in flying insects II. Measurement of induced flow J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 43 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. Altshuler, W. B. Dickson, J. T. Vance, S. P. Roberts, and M. H. Dickinson Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight PNAS, December 13, 2005; 102(50): 18213 - 18218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann, S. P. Sane, and M. Dickinson The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3075 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Borrell, J. A. Goldbogen, and R. Dudley Aquatic wing flapping at low Reynolds numbers: swimming kinematics of the Antarctic pteropod, Clione antarctica J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 208(15): 2939 - 2949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. Fry, R. Sayaman, and M. H. Dickinson The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2303 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nauwelaerts, E. J. Stamhuis, and P. Aerts Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs I. A momentum-impulse approach J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1435 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Maybury and F.-O. Lehmann The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2004; 207(26): 4707 - 4726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Dickson and M. H. Dickinson The effect of advance ratio on the aerodynamics of revolving wings J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4269 - 4281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. J. Wang The role of drag in insect hovering J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2004; 207(23): 4147 - 4155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. N. Balint and M. H. Dickinson Neuromuscular control of aerodynamic forces and moments in the blowfly, Calliphora vicina J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3813 - 3838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Borrell and M. J. Medeiros Thermal stability and muscle efficiency in hovering orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini) J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 2925 - 2933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and S. L. Lan A computational study of the aerodynamic forces and power requirements of dragonfly (Aeschna juncea) hovering J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2004; 207(11): 1887 - 1901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Birch, W. B. Dickson, and M. H. Dickinson Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1063 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Wu and M. Sun Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1137 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Roberts, J. F. Harrison, and R. Dudley Allometry of kinematics and energetics in carpenter bees (Xylocopa varipuncta) hovering in variable-density gases J. Exp. Biol., February 22, 2004; 207(6): 993 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Dillon and R. Dudley Allometry of maximum vertical force production during hovering flight of neotropical orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini) J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 417 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. J. Wang, J. M. Birch, and M. H. Dickinson Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 449 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. H. Wu Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 3065 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Birch and M. H. Dickinson The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 206(13): 2257 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Feuerbacher, J. H. Fewell, S. P. Roberts, E. F. Smith, and J. F. Harrison Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2003; 206(11): 1855 - 1865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. N. Fry, R. Sayaman, and M. H. Dickinson The Aerodynamics of Free-Flight Maneuvers in Drosophila Science, April 18, 2003; 300(5618): 495 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. McHenry, E. Azizi, and J. A. Strother The hydrodynamics of locomotion at intermediate Reynolds numbers: undulatory swimming in ascidian larvae (Botrylloides sp.) J. Exp. Biol., March 2, 2003; 206(2): 327 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Wang, L. Zeng, H. Liu, and C. Yin Measuring wing kinematics, flight trajectory and body attitude during forward flight and turning maneuvers in dragonflies J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2003; 206(4): 745 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Walker Rotational lift: something different or more of the same? J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2002; 205(24): 3783 - 3792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L. Altshuler and R. Dudley The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2325 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. Tang Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2413 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Fischer, H. Wolf, and A. Buschges The locust tegula: kinematic parameters and activity pattern during the wing stroke J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1531 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Usherwood and C. P. Ellington The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1547 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2002; 205(8): 1087 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. N. Balint and M. H. Dickinson The correlation between wing kinematics and steering muscle activity in the blowfly Calliphora vicina J. Exp. Biol., March 14, 2002; 204(24): 4213 - 4226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Frye Effects of stretch receptor ablation on the optomotor control of lift in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3683 - 3691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Frye Encoding properties of the wing hinge stretch receptor in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3693 - 3702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
