spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parra, G.
Right arrow Articles by Yúfera, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parra, G.
Right arrow Articles by Yúfera, M.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 2175-2183 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Comparative energetics during early development of two marine fish species, Solea senegalensis (Kaup) and Sparus aurata (L.)

G. Parra* and M. Yúfera{ddagger}

Instituto de Ciencias, Marinas de Andalucía, CSIC, Apartado Oficial s/n, Puerto Real, E-11510 Cádiz, Spain
* Present address: Dept. Biología Animal, Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Jaén, Paraje de las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain

{ddagger}Author for correspondence (e-mail: manuel.yufera{at}icman.csic.es)

Accepted April 2, 2001

Growth, energy content, ingestion and respiration rates and energetic efficiencies were measured in the larvae of two marine fish (Solea senegalensis and Sparus aurata) whose eggs have a similar diameter (approximately 1mm) and energy content (approximately 1J), but whose larvae reach a quite different mass after the first month of life. Experiments were carried out in populations reared under the same conditions in the laboratory during the first month after hatching. Solea senegalensis grow from hatching to the start of metamorphosis (approximately day 14) at twice the rate of Sparus aurata (specific growth rate for Solea senegalensis 0.25µgday-1; specific growth rate for Sparus aurata 0.12µgday-1). The tissues in Solea senegalensis larvae accumulated energetic reserves that were used during metamorphosis, which occurred during the third week after hatching. Ingestion and respiration rates differed in the two species during the experimental period. Although Solea senegalensis continued eating during metamorphosis, the specific ingestion rates decreased during the process. Nevertheless, no great differences in specific ingestion rates and rates of oxygen consumption were observed when comparing the same larval mass range. Larvae of both species showed an allometric relationship between respiration rate and biomass. The energetic efficiencies calculated in the present study denoted different metabolic patterns in each species. In Solea senegalensis, the energy used for growth increased progressively during the larval (pelagic) period and then, from the first signs of metamorphic transformation, remained almost constant. In this species, the energy allocated to growth was greater than that allocated to metabolic processes. Sparus aurata invested less energy in growth than in metabolic processes and displayed a constant energy allocation throughout the experimental period. During the first month after hatching, Solea senegalensis always allocated more energy for growth than did Sparus aurata.

Key words: fish, larva, larval growth, energetic efficiency, ingestion rate, respiration rate, Senegal sole, Solea senegalensis, gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata.







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001