QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Combes, S. A. Articles by Daniel, T. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Combes, S. A. Articles by Daniel, T. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 2073-2085 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Shape, flapping and flexion: wing and fin design for forward flight

S. A. Combes^* and T. L. Daniel

Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

*e-mail: scombes{at}u.washington.edu

Accepted March 22, 2001

Both kinematics and morphology are critical determinants of performance in flapping flight. However, the functional consequences of changes in these traits are not yet well understood. Traditional aerodynamic studies of planform wing shape have suggested that high-aspect-ratio wings generate more force per area and perform more efficiently than low-aspect-ratio wings, but these analyses may neglect critical components of flapping flight such as unsteady fluid dynamics and wing or fin flexion. In this paper, we use an unsteady potential flow analysis that incorporates wing flexion to test predictions of optimal wing shape under varying degrees of unsteady motion and wing flexion. We focus on forward flapping flight and examine the effects of wing/fin morphology and movements on thrust generation and efficiency. We test the model by comparing our predictions with kinematic data derived from the aquatic flight of the ratfish Hydrolagus colliei. Our analyses show that aspect ratio and the proportion of area in the outer one-fifth of the wing can characterize wing shape in terms of aero- or hydrodynamic performance. By comparing the performance of wings that vary in these two parameters, we find that traditional predictions of optimal wing shape are valid only under limited circumstances (when flapping frequency is low, wings are stiff or wings are tapered at the tips). This indicates a complex relationship between locomotor traits and performance and helps explain the diversity of wing kinematics and morphologies observed in nature.

Key words: locomotion, wing shape, flexion, unsteady effect, flapping flight, aquatic flight, swimming, ratfish, Hydrolagus colliei.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. L. Hedrick, B. W. Tobalske, and A. A. Biewener Estimates of circulation and gait change based on a three-dimensional kinematic analysis of flight in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) and ringed turtle-doves (Streptopelia risoria) J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2002; 205(10): 1389 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Walker and M. W. Westneat Performance limits of labriform propulsion and correlates with fin shape and motion J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2002; 205(2): 177 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Frye Encoding properties of the wing hinge stretch receptor in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3693 - 3702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]