QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Altshuler, D. L. Articles by Chen, J. S. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Altshuler, D. L. Articles by Chen, J. S. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 2021-2027 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Hovering Performance of Hummingbirds in Hyperoxic Gas Mixtures

Douglas L. Altshuler^*, Peng Chai and Jeff S. P. Chen

Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA

*e-mail: colibri{at}uts.cc.utexas.edu

Accepted March 13, 2001

Hummingbirds evolved during a period of decline in atmospheric oxygen concentration and currently encounter varying levels of oxygen availability along their elevational distribution. We tested the hypothesis that inspiration of hyperoxic gas increases hummingbird hovering performance when birds are simultaneously challenged aerodynamically. We measured the maximum duration of hovering flight while simultaneously monitoring the rate of oxygen consumption of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) in low-density heliox that was either normoxic (21% O₂) or hyperoxic (35% O₂). As air density decreased below 0.85kgm^-3, hummingbirds hovered significantly longer in hyperoxia than in normoxia, but the air density at which the birds could no longer sustain hovering flight was independent of oxygen concentration. At low air densities in hyperoxia flight trials, hummingbirds appeared to increase their rate of oxygen consumption relative to flight sequences at equivalent densities in normoxia trials, but these differences were not significant. We tested the hypothesis that hummingbirds can discriminate between environments that differ in oxygen concentration. In another density-reduction experiment, hummingbirds were allowed to choose between artificial feeders infused with either normoxic or hyperoxic gases. The hypothesis was not supported because birds failed to associate oxygen concentration with a particular feeder independently of air density. Supplemental oxygen thus yields increased hovering duration at intermediate air densities, but the minimum density at which birds can fly is limited exclusively by aerodynamic considerations.

Key words: Archilochus colubris, hovering, flight performance, hyperoxia, ruby-throated hummingbird

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Altshuler and R. Dudley Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2003; 206(18): 3139 - 3147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Altshuler and R. Dudley The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2325 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]