QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Connaughton, M. A. Articles by Fine, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Connaughton, M. A. Articles by Fine, M. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 9 1503-1512, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Effects of fish size and temperature on weakfish disturbance calls: implications for the mechanism of sound generation

MA Connaughton, MH Taylor and ML Fine
Washington College, Department of Biology, Chestertown, MD 21620, USA. martin.connaughton@washcoll.edu

To categorize variation in disturbance calls of the weakfish Cynoscion regalis and to understand their generation, we recorded sounds produced by different-sized fish, and by similar-sized fish at different temperatures, as well as muscle electromyograms. Single, simultaneous twitches of the bilateral sonic muscles produce a single sound pulse consisting of a two- to three-cycle acoustic waveform. Typical disturbance calls at 18 degrees C consist of trains of 2-15 pulses with a sound pressure level (SPL) of 74 dB re 20 microPa at 10 cm, a peak frequency of 540 Hz, a repetition rate of 20 Hz and a pulse duration of 3.5 ms. The pulse duration suggests an incredibly short twitch time. Sound pressure level (SPL) and pulse duration increase and dominant frequency decreases in larger fish, whereas SPL, repetition rate and dominant frequency increase and pulse duration decreases with increasing temperature. The dominant frequency is inversely related to pulse duration and appears to be determined by the duration of muscle contraction. We suggest that the lower dominant frequency of larger fish is caused by a longer pulse (=longer muscle twitch) and not by the lower resonant frequency of a larger swimbladder.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Fine, C. B. King, and T. M. Cameron Acoustical properties of the swimbladder in the oyster toadfish Opsanus tau J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2009; 212(21): 3542 - 3552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Parmentier, O. Colleye, and D. Mann Hearing ability in three clownfish species J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2009; 212(13): 2023 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Parmentier, J.-P. Lagardere, J.-B. Braquegnier, P. Vandewalle, and M. L. Fine Sound production mechanism in carapid fish: first example with a slow sonic muscle J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2952 - 2960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Connaughton Sound generation in the searobin (Prionotus carolinus), a fish with alternate sonic muscle contraction J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2004; 207(10): 1643 - 1654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Connaughton, M. L. Fine, and M. H. Taylor Weakfish sonic muscle: influence of size, temperature and season J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2002; 205(15): 2183 - 2188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]