spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muller, D.
Right arrow Articles by Menzel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muller, D.
Right arrow Articles by Menzel, R.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 8 1351-1364, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Sensory preconditioning in honeybees

D Muller, B Gerber, F Hellstern, M Hammer and R Menzel
Institut fur Neurobiologie, Freie Universitat Berlin, Konigin-Luise-Strasse 28/30, Germany. mmdmueller@gmx.de

Sensory preconditioning means that reinforcement of stimulus A after unreinforced exposure to a compound AB also leads to responses to stimulus B. Here, we describe and analyze sensory preconditioning in an insect, the honeybee Apis mellifera. Using two-element odorant compounds in classical conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex, we found (i) that sensory preconditioning is not due to stimulus generalization, (ii) that paired, but not unpaired, presentation of elements supports sensory preconditioning, (iii) that simultaneous, but not sequential, exposure to the elements of the compound supports sensory preconditioning and (iv) that a single presentation of the compound yields maximal sensory preconditioning. The results are discussed with respect to configural and chain-like associative explanations for sensory preconditioning. We suggest an experience-dependent step of compound processing, establishing configural units, as an additional explanation for sensory preconditioning.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
S. A. Hussaini, B. Komischke, R. Menzel, and H. Lachnit
Forward and backward second-order Pavlovian conditioning in honeybees
Learn. Mem., October 1, 2007; 14(10): 678 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. BREMBS and M. HEISENBERG
CONDITIONING WITH COMPOUND STIMULI IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN THE FLIGHT SIMULATOR
J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2849 - 2859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
R. Menzel, G. Manz, R. Menzel, and U. Greggers
Massed and Spaced Learning in Honeybees: The Role of CS, US, the Intertrial Interval, and the Test Interval
Learn. Mem., July 1, 2001; 8(4): 198 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
R. Menzel
Searching for the Memory Trace in a Mini-Brain, the Honeybee
Learn. Mem., March 1, 2001; 8(2): 53 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2000