spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Aulner, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Aulner, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 23 3639-3654, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Sexual dimorphism in forelimb muscles of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana: a functional analysis of isometric contractile properties

SE Peters and DA Aulner
Department of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, NC 28223, USA. sepeters@email.uncc.edu

In many species of frog, the forelimb muscles important in amplexus are known to be much larger in males than in females. We studied this dimorphism in three forelimb muscles in the bullfrog [abductor indicus longus (AIL), flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor carpi radialis (ECR)] by testing their isometric contractile properties. One muscle that is not dimorphic, the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), was also studied as a control. In addition to being greater in wet mass and in cross-sectional area in the males, our data show that the dimorphic muscles also produce significantly larger isometric forces in males than in females. The tetanic force per cm(2) of muscle cross-sectional area did not differ between the sexes, so that force within a muscle varies directly with muscle size. However, a number of the contractile variables we measured show that male muscles differ functionally from those of females. The male twitch contraction times were significantly longer in the AIL, and the male half-relaxation times were longer in both the AIL and FCR. These two dimorphic muscles were also significantly less fatiguable in males than were the corresponding female muscles. Their higher endurance resulted from the maintenance of high levels of unrelaxed force sustained between trains of stimuli during the fatigue test. This sustained force is much less pronounced in the female muscles, suggesting that high levels of sustained force may be a key functional feature that enables males to maintain amplexus economically for prolonged periods.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. D. Rogers, M. B. Thompson, and F. Seebacher
Beneficial acclimation: sex specific thermal acclimation of metabolic capacity in the striped marsh frog (Limnodynastes peronii)
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2007; 210(16): 2932 - 2938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. A. Navas and R. S. James
Sexual dimorphism of extensor carpi radialis muscle size, isometric force, relaxation rate and stamina during the breeding season of the frog Rana temporaria Linnaeus 1758
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2007; 210(4): 715 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. Lee Clark and S. E. Peters
Isometric contractile properties of sexually dimorphic forelimb muscles in the marine toad Bufo marinus Linnaeus 1758: functional analysis and implications for amplexus
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3448 - 3456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Nauwelaerts and P. Aerts
Take-off and landing forces in jumping frogs
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 66 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. H. Marden and L. R. Allen
Molecules, muscles, and machines: Universal performance characteristics of motors
PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4161 - 4166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. H. Marden and L. R. Allen
Molecules, muscles, and machines: Universal performance characteristics of motors
PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4161 - 4166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2000