|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 21 3243-3254, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
PA Faure and RR Hoy
Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Seeley G. Mudd Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-2702, USA. paul4@u.washington.edu
Although early work on the tettigoniid T large fiber suggested that it might mediate early-warning and escape behavior in katydids, the majority of research thereafter has focused on the ability of the T-cell to detect, localize and/or discriminate mate-calling song. Interestingly, T-cell responses to conspecific song are rarely examined for more than a few seconds, despite the fact that many katydids sing for minutes or hours at a time. In this paper, the second of a pair examining the physiology of the T-cell in Neoconocephalus ensiger, we recorded T-cell responses using longer-duration playbacks (3 min) of conspecific song (Katydid signal 30 ms syllables, 9-25 kHz bandwidth, 12-15 kHz peak frequency) and two types of bat-like ultrasound, a 10 ms, 80->30 kHz frequency-modulated sweep (Bat 10 signal) and a 30 ms, 80->30 kHz frequency-modulated sweep (Bat 30 signal). Spiking responses were distinctly biased towards the short-duration ultrasonic signal, with more spikes per pulse, at a shorter spike latency and at a higher instantaneous firing frequency to the Bat 10 signal than to the Katydid signal or, surprisingly, to the Bat 30 signal. The ability of the T-cell to encode the temporal pattern of the stimulus was particularly striking. Only for the predatory bat signals did T-cell spiking faithfully copy the stimulus; playbacks of conspecific song resulted in significantly weaker spiking responses, particularly in male katydids. The results demonstrate that responses from the T-cell alone may be sufficient for katydids to discriminate biologically relevant signals pertinent to the phonotactic behavior patterns involved in mate attraction and predator avoidance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Triblehorn and J. Schul Sensory-Encoding Differences Contribute to Species-Specific Call Recognition Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1348 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. ter Hofstede and J. H. Fullard The neuroethology of song cessation in response to gleaning bat calls in two species of katydids, Neoconocephalus ensiger and Amblycorypha oblongifolia J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2431 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Triblehorn and D. D. Yager Timing of praying mantis evasive responses during simulated bat attack sequences J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): 1867 - 1876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Triblehorn and D. D. Yager Implanted electrode recordings from a praying mantis auditory interneuron during flying bat attacks J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 205(3): 307 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Faure and R. Hoy Auditory symmetry analysis J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2000; 203(21): 3209 - 3223. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Faure and R. Hoy Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2000; 203(21): 3225 - 3242. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||