spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a Workshop for 2011 spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faure, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoy, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faure, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoy, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 21 3225-3242, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. I. Tuning and responses to pure tones

PA Faure and RR Hoy
Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Seeley G. Mudd Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-2702, USA. paul4@u.washington.edu

The tuning and pure-tone physiology of the T-cell prothoracic auditory interneuron were investigated in the nocturnal katydid Neoconocephalus ensiger. The T-cell is extremely sensitive and broadly tuned, particularly to high-frequency ultrasound (>20 kHz). Adult thresholds were lowest and showed their least variability for frequencies ranging from 25 to 80 kHz. The average best threshold of the T-cell in N. ensiger ranged from 28 to 38 dB SPL and the best frequency from 20 to 27 kHz. In females, the T-cell is slightly more sensitive to the range of frequencies encompassing the spectrum of male song. Tuning of the T-cell in non-volant nymphs was comparable with that of adults, and this precocious ultrasound sensitivity supports the view that it has a role in the detection of terrestrial sources of predaceous ultrasound. In adults, T-cell tuning is narrower than that of the whole auditory (tympanic) organ, but only at audio frequencies. Superthreshold physiological experiments revealed that T-cell responses were ultrasound-biased, with intensity/response functions steeper and spike latencies shorter at 20, 30 and 40 kHz than at 5, 10 and 15 kHz. The same was also true for T-cell stimulation at 90 degrees compared with stimulation at 0 degrees within a frequency, which supports early T-cell research showing that excitation of the contralateral ear inhibits ipsilateral T-cell responses. In a temporal summation experiment, the integration time of the T-cell at 40 kHz (integration time constant tau =6.1 ms) was less than half that measured at 15 kHz ( tau =15.0 ms). Moreover, T-cell spiking in response to short-duration pure-tone trains mimicking calling conspecifics (15 kHz) and bat echolocation hunting sequences (40 kHz) revealed that temporal pattern-copying was superior for ultrasonic stimulation. Apparently, T-cell responses are reduced or inhibited by stimulation with audio frequencies, which leads to the prediction that the T-cell will encode conspecific song less well than bat-like frequency-modulated sweeps during acoustic playback. The fact that the T-cell is one of the most sensitive ultrasound neurons in tympanate insects is most consistent with it serving an alarm, warning or escape function in both volant and non-volant katydids (nymphs and adults).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. M. ter Hofstede and J. H. Fullard
The neuroethology of song cessation in response to gleaning bat calls in two species of katydids, Neoconocephalus ensiger and Amblycorypha oblongifolia
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2431 - 2441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. D. Triblehorn and D. D. Yager
Timing of praying mantis evasive responses during simulated bat attack sequences
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): 1867 - 1876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Schul and A. C. Patterson
What determines the tuning of hearing organs and the frequency of calls? A comparative study in the katydid genus Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae)
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2003; 206(1): 141 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. D. Triblehorn and D. D. Yager
Implanted electrode recordings from a praying mantis auditory interneuron during flying bat attacks
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 205(3): 307 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Faure and R. Hoy
Auditory symmetry analysis
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2000; 203(21): 3209 - 3223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Faure and R. Hoy
Neuroethology of the katydid T-cell. II. Responses to acoustic playback of conspecific and predatory signals
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2000; 203(21): 3243 - 3254.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2000