|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 18 2781-2796, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
CD Wilga and PJ Motta
Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA. cwilga@oeb.harvard.edu
This study investigates the motor pattern and head movements during feeding of a durophagus shark, the bonnethead Sphyrna tiburo, using electromyography and simultaneous high-speed video. Sphyrna tiburo feeds almost exclusively on hard-shelled crabs, with shrimp and fish taken occasionally. It captures crabs by ram feeding, then processes or reduces the prey by crushing it between molariform teeth, finally transporting the prey by suction for swallowing. The prey-crushing mechanism is distinct from that of ram or bite capture and suction transport. This crushing mechanism is accomplished by altering the duration of jaw adductor muscle activity and modifying jaw kinematics by the addition of a second jaw-closing phase. In crushing events, motor activity of the jaw adductor muscles continues (biting of the prey occurs as the jaws close and continues after the jaws have closed) throughout a second jaw-closing phase, unlike capture and transport events during which motor activity (biting) ceases at jaw closure. Sphyrna tiburo is able to take advantage of a resource (hard prey) that is not readily available to most sharks by utilizing a suite of durophagous characteristics: molariform teeth, a modified jaw protrusor muscle, altered jaw adductor activity and modified jaw kinematics. Sphyrna tiburo is a specialist feeder on crab prey as demonstrated by the lack of differences in kinematic or motor patterns when offered prey of differing hardness and its apparent lack of ability to modulate its behavior when feeding on other prey. Functional patterns are altered and coupled with modifications in dental and jaw morphology to produce diverse crushing behaviors in elasmobranchs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Clark and A. P. Summers Morphology and kinematics of feeding in hagfish: possible functional advantages of jaws J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 3897 - 3909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Wilga, P. J. Motta, and C. P. Sanford Evolution and ecology of feeding in elasmobranchs Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 55 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Huber, T. G. Eason, R. E. Hueter, and P. J. Motta Analysis of the bite force and mechanical design of the feeding mechanism of the durophagous horn shark Heterodontus francisci J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3553 - 3571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.L. Zeredo, K. Toda, and K. Soma Nature of Neck Motor Unit Activities Evoked by Different Trigeminal Inputs in Rats J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2003; 82(5): 402 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Wilga, R. E. Hueter, P. C. Wainwright, and P. J. Motta Evolution of Upper Jaw Protrusion Mechanisms in Elasmobranchs Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2001; 41(6): 1248 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||