spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denny, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchette, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Denny, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchette, C. A.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 17 2623-2639, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Hydrodynamics, shell shape, behavior and survivorship in the owl limpet Lottia gigantea

MW Denny and CA Blanchette
Stanford University, Hopkins Marine Station, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA. mwdenny@leland.stanford.edu

On wave-swept rocky shores, limpets are subjected to water velocities in excess of 20 m s(-1), which may impose large hydrodynamic forces. Despite the extreme severity of this flow environment, predictions from conical models suggest that limpets' shells are typically far from the optimal shape that would minimize the risk of dislodgment, a deviation that is allowed by the high tenacity of the limpets' adhesive system. In this study, we test this conclusion using an actual limpet. The shell of Lottia gigantea differs substantially from the hydrodynamic optimum in that its apex is displaced anteriorly to form a plough, which is used to defend the limpet's territory. The hydrodynamic effects of this shape are similar to those observed in conical models: the animal experiences an increased lift when facing into the flow and a decreased lift when the flow is at its back. However, neither effect has a substantial impact on the risk of dislodgment. When the animal is stationary, its adhesion to the substratum is very strong, and its risk of being dislodged is small regardless of its orientation to the flow and despite its sub-optimal shape. In contrast, when the animal is crawling rapidly, its adhesion is substantially decreased, and it would probably be dislodged by rapid flow even if the shell were shaped optimally. The risk of dislodgment by waves is therefore functionally independent of shell shape. In essence, despite the extremely high water velocities to which this species is subjected, its shell has had the 'permission' of the flow environment to respond to other selective factors, in particular those associated with its aggressive, territorial behavior. The result is a shell that is both a potent territorial weapon and a functional (albeit less than optimal) hydrodynamic shape.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PaleobiologyHome page
Characters in context: molluscan shells and the forces that mold them
Paleobiology, March 1, 2002; 28(1): 41 - 54.


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. K. Ellem, J. E. Furst, and K. D. Zimmerman
Shell clamping behaviour in the limpet Cellana tramoserica
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2002; 205(4): 539 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Denny
Limits to optimization: fluid dynamics, adhesive strength and the evolution of shape in limpet shells
J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 2000; 203(17): 2603 - 2622.
[Abstract] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2000