spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denny, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Denny, M. W.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 17 2603-2622, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Limits to optimization: fluid dynamics, adhesive strength and the evolution of shape in limpet shells

MW Denny
Stanford University, Hopkins Marine Station, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA. mwdenny@leland.stanford.edu

Limpets are commonly found on wave-swept rocky shores, where they may be subjected to water velocities in excess of 20 m s(-1). These extreme flows can impose large forces (lift and drag), challenging the animal's ability to adhere to the substratum. It is commonly thought that the conical shape of limpet shells has evolved in part to reduce these hydrodynamic forces while providing a large aperture for adhesion. This study documents how lift and drag actually vary with the shape of limpet-like models and uses these data to explore the potential of hydrodynamic forces to serve as a selective factor in the evolution of limpet shell morphology. At a low ratio of shell height to shell radius, lift is the dominant force, while at high ratios of height to radius drag is dominant. The risk of dislodgment is minimized when the ratio of height to radius is 1.06 and the apex is in the center of the shell. Real limpets are seldom optimally shaped, however, with a typical height-to-radius ratio of 0.68 and an apex well anterior of the shell's center. The disparity between the actual and the hydrodynamically optimal shape of shells may be due to the high tenacity of limpets' adhesive system. Most limpets adhere to the substratum so strongly that they are unlikely to be dislodged by lift or drag regardless of the shape of their shell. The evolution of a tenacious adhesion system (perhaps in response to predation) has thus preempted selection for a hydrodynamically optimal shell, allowing the shell to respond to alternative selective factors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
Characters in context: molluscan shells and the forces that mold them
Paleobiology, March 1, 2002; 28(1): 41 - 54.



Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. K. Ellem, J. E. Furst, and K. D. Zimmerman
Shell clamping behaviour in the limpet Cellana tramoserica
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2002; 205(4): 539 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Denny and C. Blanchette
Hydrodynamics, shell shape, behavior and survivorship in the owl limpet Lottia gigantea
J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 2000; 203(17): 2623 - 2639.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2000