|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 14 2133-2148, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
DJ Irschick and BC Jayne
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0006, USA.
Although many studies have investigated how locomotor capacities change with size, few studies have examined whether different-sized individuals within a species have similar kinematics during locomotion. We quantified the skeletal limb morphology and the three-dimensional kinematics of the hindlimb of four sizes (4-66 g) of the lizard Dipsosaurus dorsalis moving steadily at both the walk-run transition (50 % duty factor) and at a moderately fast speed of 250 cm s(-)(1). We used analyses of variance to test whether limb movements changed with size and to determine whether size and speed had interactive effects on kinematics. The disproportionately long hindlimbs of smaller lizards partly contributed to their relatively greater (i.e. adjusted by snout-vent length) values of linear kinematic variables. Both relative linear and angular kinematics changed significantly with both size and speed, both of which had widespread interactive effects. By having more extension of the knee and ankle joints, and thus a relatively higher hip height during stance, the slow-speed movements of small lizards displayed some of the characteristics of the fast-speed movements in larger lizards. Further, approximately one-fifth and two-fifths of the strides of the two smallest size classes were digitigrade at the lower and higher speeds, respectively, whereas the two largest size classes always had a plantigrade foot posture. Some of the most striking effects of size on kinematics were most evident at the lower of the two speeds. Unlike interspecific studies, which show that the limbs often become more crouched with decreased size, the more extended limbs of smaller lizards in this study suggest that variation in size alone cannot be the causal reason for differences in limb posture.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Young Ontogeny of joint mechanics in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis): functional implications for mammalian limb growth and locomotor development J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2009; 212(10): 1576 - 1591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Pontzer Effective limb length and the scaling of locomotor cost in terrestrial animals J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2007; 210(10): 1752 - 1761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Day and B. C. Jayne Interspecific scaling of the morphology and posture of the limbs during the locomotion of cats (Felidae) J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2007; 210(4): 642 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Hsieh Three-dimensional hindlimb kinematics of water running in the plumed basilisk lizard (Basiliscus plumifrons) J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4363 - 4377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Toro, A. Herrel, B. Vanhooydonck, and D. J. Irschick A biomechanical analysis of intra- and interspecific scaling of jumping and morphology in Caribbean Anolis lizards J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2003; 206(15): 2641 - 2652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||