QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Novales Flamarique, I. Articles by Boxaspen, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Novales Flamarique, I. Articles by Boxaspen, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 11 1649-1657, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Ontogenetic changes in visual sensitivity of the parasitic salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis

I Novales Flamarique, HI Browman, M Belanger and K Boxaspen
Institute of Marine Research, Austevoll Aquaculture Research Station, N-5392 Storebo, Norway. inovales@hotmail.com

The salmon louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, is an ectoparasitic copepod of salmonid fishes whose life cycle involves two broadly defined, free-living larval stages, the nauplius and the copepodid. After settling on a host, the copepodid goes through various transformations to become a mobile adult. We recorded swimming responses of free-swimming salmon lice at the naupliar, copepodid and adult stages to the onset (ON) and offset (OFF) of lights of varying spectral irradiance and polarization. Nauplii showed a prominent swim-up OFF response across the spectrum 352-652 nm, but no ON response. Copepodids exhibited a swim-up ON response and a passive (sinking) OFF response across the same spectral range. Adults showed active swim-up responses to both ON and OFF stimuli, although the OFF response was proportionately stronger. The spectral range of the adult ON and OFF responses was the same as that of the copepodids and slightly greater than that of the nauplii, which did not exhibit responses at 652 nm. The absolute sensitivity of copepodids under white light (approx. 10(-13) photons m(2) s(1)) was higher than that of nauplii (approx. 10(-17) photons(-1) m(2 )s, OFF response) and that of adult female lice (approx. 10(-14) photons(-1)m(2)s). This suggests that the naupliar visual system is best suited for detection of shadows (e.g. the host) under a bright light field (daylight hours), while copepodids and adults may be more specialized for host detection at crepuscular periods and during the night, when light levels are low. None of the developmental stages responded to the rotation of the plane of polarized light or exhibited any difference in directed response when polarized light was used in place of diffuse light.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Heuch, M. H. Doall, and J. Yen Water flow around a fish mimic attracts a parasitic and deters a planktonic copepod J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2007; 29(suppl_1): i3 - i16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. N. Flamarique and H. I. Browman Foraging and prey-search behaviour of small juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) under polarized light J. Exp. Biol., March 9, 2002; 204(14): 2415 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]