spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tautz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tautz, J.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 10 1581-1587, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Comb-wax discrimination by honeybees tested with the proboscis extension reflex

B Frohlich, M Riederer and J Tautz
Julius-von-Sachs-Institut fur Biowissenschaften mit Botanischem Garten, Lehrstuhl fur Botanik II, Okophysiologie und Vegetationsokologie, Universitat Wurzburg, D-97082 Wurzburg, Germany.

We used the proboscis extension reflex of honeybees to test their ability to discriminate between comb waxes of different ages (wax scales, 1-week-old wax, 2- to 3-year-old wax, 8- to 10-year-old wax). Such waxes differ in their chemical composition, and an ability to discriminate between them may aid the orientation of the bees in the nest. To train the bees, we used whole extracts of waxes and four different fractions of the whole extract based on different elutions of solid-phase extractions (extract I, fraction A eluted with hexane and fraction B with diethylether; extract II, fraction B further subdivided into fraction C by elution with isopropylchloride and fraction D by elution with diethylether). In a differential training regime (six learning and six test trials) with whole extracts or with the different fractions, we paired one type of wax with a reward and another with no reward. The bees learned to discriminate between all tested pairs of whole extracts. The two subfractions (fractions A and B) gave different results: the bees could discriminate between waxes of different ages when fraction B was used but not when fraction A was used. A further subdivision of fraction B into fractions C and D showed that only fraction D contained the elements that enabled bees to discriminate between old and new wax. Fraction D makes up only 5?8 % of the total wax mass and contains hydroxy alkyl esters (5?6 % of the total wax mass), primary alcohols (0.3?0.5 % of the total wax mass) and acids (0.06?1. 0 % of the total wax mass). Fractions A and C (together forming 62?64 % of the total wax mass), which consist of unbranched and branched aliphatic hydrocarbons and alkyl esters, could not be discriminated by the bees. The remaining wax mass (25?29 %) was eluted with a mixture of chloroform, methanol and water (13:5:1) as fraction E.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
N. Chaline, J.-C. Sandoz, S. J. Martin, F. L.W. Ratnieks, and G. R. Jones
Learning and Discrimination of Individual Cuticular Hydrocarbons by Honeybees (Apis mellifera)
Chem Senses, May 1, 2005; 30(4): 327 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Stabentheiner, H. Kovac, and S. Schmaranzer
Honeybee nestmate recognition: the thermal behaviour of guards and their examinees
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2002; 205(17): 2637 - 2642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2000