|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 24 3715-3730, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
V Delheusy and VL Bels
Institut de Zoology, University of Liege, Quai Van Beneden 22, B-4020 Liege, Belgium and Hautes Ecoles Provinciales de Charleroi et du Hainaut Occidental and Centre Agronomique de Recherches Appliquees du Hainaut, Rue Paul Pastur 11, B-
The kinematics of feeding in the gekkotan lizard Phelsuma madagascariensis (Scleroglossa) was investigated using high-speed cinematography (200-300 frames s(-)(1)) and X-ray films (64 frames s(-)(1)). Qualitative kinematic analysis of the head and jaw displacement of the prey to (capture) and within (reduction, transport, swallowing, licking) the buccal cavity are compared for two types of prey (crickets and mealworms) in 30 feeding sequences from four individuals. Maximal displacement of structures and timing of events are compared statistically to assess the differences among the phases and the prey using analysis of variance. P. madagascariensis uses its jaws only to capture the two types of prey item, and the capture jaw cycle is divided into fast-opening (FO), fast-closing (FC) and slow-closing (SC) stages only. As in iguanians and other scleroglossans, the reduction and transport cycles always involve a slow opening (SOI and SOII) stage before the FO stage, followed by FC and SC stages: this last stage was not easily identified in all feeding phase. Transport of the prey was followed by a large number of licking cycles. Our data show (i) that the capture profile in gekkotans is similar to that observed for other scleroglossans and different from that described for iguanians (e.g. the absence of an SO stage); (ii) that the kinematics of jaw and related hyo-lingual cycles of intraoral manipulation (reduction and transport) are similar in lizards with a very different hyo-lingual system (Iguania, Gekkota and Scincomorpha), suggesting a basic mechanism of feeding cycles in squamates, transformed in varanids and snakes; and (iii) that prey type affects the kinematics of capture and manipulation, although the high level of variation among lizards suggests a possible individual modulation of feeding mechanism. A principal components analysis was performed to compare capture and transport cycles in this study of P. madagascariensis (Gekkota) and a previous study of Oplurus cuvieri (Iguania). This analysis separated the capture cycle of each species, but the transport cycles were not completely separated. These results demonstrate the complexity of the modulation and evolution of feeding process in squamates.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. J. Montuelle, A. Herrel, P.-A. Libourel, L. Reveret, and V. L. Bels Locomotor-feeding coupling during prey capture in a lizard (Gerrhosaurus major): effects of prehension mode J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2009; 212(6): 768 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Clark and A. P. Summers Morphology and kinematics of feeding in hagfish: possible functional advantages of jaws J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 3897 - 3909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Meyers and A. Herrel Prey capture kinematics of ant-eating lizards J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2005; 208(1): 113 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Herrel, J. J. Meyers, K. C. Nishikawa, and F. D. Vree The Evolution of Feeding Motor Patterns in Lizards: Modulatory Complexity and Possible Constraints Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2001; 41(6): 1311 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
