QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Issa, F. A. Articles by Edwards, D. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Issa, F. A. Articles by Edwards, D. H.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 24 3497-3506, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Dominance hierarchy formation in juvenile crayfish procambarus clarkii

FA Issa, DJ Adamson and DH Edwards
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-4010, USA. biodhe@panther.gsu.edu.

The formation of social dominance hierarchies was studied in groups of five juvenile crayfish, 1.3-1.8 cm in length. Animals were grouped together in a small, featureless aquarium after having lived in isolation for more than a month. The occurrence of each of four behavior patterns ('attack', 'approach', 'retreat' and 'escape') was recorded for each animal, together with the frequency of encounters and the frequency of wins and losses. The frequencies of wins and losses were used to calculate the relative dominance value of each animal in the group. High levels of fighting developed immediately upon grouping the animals, and a positive feedback relationship between attacking and winning enabled one animal in each group to emerge quickly as the superdominant. If that animal was the largest, it remained as the superdominant; otherwise, it was replaced as superdominant within the first few days by the largest animal. This form of dominance hierarchy, with one superdominant and four subordinates, persisted throughout the duration of the grouping. Fighting declined over the first hour and by 24 h had dropped to low levels. After the first day, approaches were used together with attacks, and retreats replaced escapes. Attack and approach were the behavior patterns displayed most frequently by animals with high dominance values, whereas retreat and escape were performed by animals of low dominance. All these trends continued to develop over the next 2 weeks as the number of agonistic encounters declined to a low level.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Y. May and A. J. Mercier Duration of socialization influences responses to a mirror: responses of dominant and subordinate crayfish diverge with time of pairing J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4428 - 4436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Hemsworth, W. Villareal, B. W. Patullo, and D. L. MacMillan Crustacean Social Behavioral Changes in Response to Isolation Biol. Bull., October 1, 2007; 213(2): 187 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-K. Song, L. M. Johnstone, M. Schmidt, C. D. Derby, and D. H. Edwards Social domination increases neuronal survival in the brain of juvenile crayfish Procambarus clarkii J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1311 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Breithaupt and P. Eger Urine makes the difference: chemical communication in fighting crayfish made visible J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2002; 205(9): 1221 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Herberholz, F. A. Issa, and D. H. Edwards Patterns of Neural Circuit Activation and Behavior during Dominance Hierarchy Formation in Freely Behaving Crayfish J. Neurosci., April 15, 2001; 21(8): 2759 - 2767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]