|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 23 3387-3396, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
AA Biewener and GB Gillis
Concord Field Station, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Bedford, MA 01730, USA. abiewener@oeb.harvard.edu
Much of what we know about animal locomotion is derived from studies examining animals moving within a single, homogeneous environment, at a steady speed and along a flat grade. As a result, the issue of how musculoskeletal function might shift to accommodate variability within the external environment has remained relatively unexplored. One possibility is that locomotor muscles are differentially recruited depending upon the environment in which the animal is moving. A second possibility is that the same muscles are recruited, but that they are activated in a different manner so that their contractile function differs according to environment. Finally, it is also possible that, in some cases, animals may not need to alter their musculoskeletal function to move under different external conditions. In this case, however, the mechanical behavior appropriate for one environmental condition may constrain locomotor performance in another. To begin to explore the means by which animals accommodate variable conditions in their environment, we present three case studies examining how musculoskeletal systems function to allow locomotion under variable conditions: (1) eels undulating through water and across land, (2) turkeys running on level and inclined surfaces, and (3) ducks using their limbs to walk and to paddle. In all three of these examples, the mechanical behavior of some muscle(s) involved in locomotion are altered, although to different degrees and in different ways. In the running turkeys, the mechanical function of a major ankle extensor muscle shifts from contracting isometrically on a flat surface (producing little work and power), to shortening actively during contraction on an uphill gradient (increasing the amount of work and power generated). In the ducks, the major ankle extensor undergoes the same general pattern of activation and shortening in water and on land, except that the absolute levels of muscle stress and strain and work output are greater during terrestrial locomotion. In eels, a transition to land elicits changes in electromyographic duty cycles and the relative timing of muscle activation, suggesting some alteration in the functional mechanics of the underlying musculature. Only by studying muscle function in animals moving under more variable conditions can we begin to characterize the functional breadth of the vertebrate musculoskeletal system and understand more fully its evolutionary design.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Sponberg and R. J. Full Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 433 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Scales and M. Butler Are powerful females powerful enough? Acceleration in gravid green iguanas (Iguana iguana) Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 47(2): 285 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Rivera, A. R. V. Rivera, E. E. Dougherty, and R. W. Blob Aquatic turning performance of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and functional consequences of a rigid body design J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4203 - 4213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Arampatzis, G. De Monte, K. Karamanidis, G. Morey-Klapsing, S. Stafilidis, and G.-P. Bruggemann Influence of the muscle-tendon unit's mechanical and morphological properties on running economy J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3345 - 3357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Rubenson, H. T. Henry, P. M. Dimoulas, and R. L. Marsh The cost of running uphill: linking organismal and muscle energy use in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2006; 209(13): 2395 - 2408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. K. Riskin, S. Parsons, W. A. Schutt Jr, G. G. Carter, and J. W. Hermanson Terrestrial locomotion of the New Zealand short-tailed bat Mystacina tuberculata and the common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1725 - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Watanuki, S. Wanless, M. Harris, J. R. Lovvorn, M. Miyazaki, H. Tanaka, and K. Sato Swim speeds and stroke patterns in wing-propelled divers: a comparison among alcids and a penguin J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2006; 209(7): 1217 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Donley, R. E. Shadwick, C. A. Sepulveda, P. Konstantinidis, and S. Gemballa Patterns of red muscle strain/activation and body kinematics during steady swimming in a lamnid shark, the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2377 - 2387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nauwelaerts, E. J. Stamhuis, and P. Aerts Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs I. A momentum-impulse approach J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1435 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. O. Swanson and A. C. Gibb Kinematics of aquatic and terrestrial escape responses in mudskippers J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2004; 207(23): 4037 - 4044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Liao Neuromuscular control of trout swimming in a vortex street: implications for energy economy during the Karman gait J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2004; 207(20): 3495 - 3506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kohlsdorf, R. S. James, J. E. Carvalho, R. S. Wilson, M. Dal Pai-Silva, and C. A. Navas Locomotor performance of closely related Tropidurus species: relationships with physiological parameters and ecological divergence J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1183 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Ashley-Ross and B. F. Bechtel Kinematics of the transition between aquatic and terrestrial locomotion in the newt Taricha torosa J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 461 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nauwelaerts and P. Aerts Propulsive impulse as a covarying performance measure in the comparison of the kinematics of swimming and jumping in frogs J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4341 - 4351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Katz Design of heterothermic muscle in fish J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2002; 205(15): 2251 - 2266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. Ahn and R. J. Full A motor and a brake: two leg extensor muscles acting at the same joint manage energy differently in a running insect J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 205(3): 379 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Syme and R. E. Shadwick Effects of longitudinal body position and swimming speed on mechanical power of deep red muscle from skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2002; 205(2): 189 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. O. Bennett, R. S. Simons, and E. L. Brainerd Twisting and Bending: The Functional Role of Salamander Lateral Hypaxial Musculature During Locomotion J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2001; 204(11): 1979 - 1989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. H. Dickinson, C. T. Farley, R. J. Full, M. A. Koehl, R. Kram, and S. Lehman How Animals Move: An Integrative View Science, April 7, 2000; 288(5463): 100 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Gillis and A. Biewener Hindlimb extensor muscle function during jumping and swimming in the toad (Bufo marinus) J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 2000; 203(23): 3547 - 3563. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Moon The mechanics of swallowing and the muscular control of diverse behaviours in gopher snakes J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 2000; 203(17): 2589 - 2601. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
