QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wootton, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wootton, R. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 23 3333-3345, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control

RJ Wootton
School of Biological Sciences, Exeter University, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK. R.J.Wootton@exeter.ac.uk

Some principles governing the design of invertebrate paired propulsive appendages are discussed, with particular reference to the extent to which information encoded in their skeletal structure determines their instantaneous shape in locomotion. The hydrostatic paired fins of some cephalopods and marine gastropods, polychaete parapodia and onychophoran lobopodia rely entirely on musculature for shape control. The deformations of walking limbs, though still under muscular control, are strongly influenced by the nature and sequence of movement of the joints. Limbs adapted for walking in air are effectively point-loaded, and their rigid components need to resist axial forces as well as bending and torsional moments. Aquatic walking limbs have little axial loading, while swimming appendages and wings experience only bending and torsional moments, and can exploit these to assist in the deformations that are necessary to gain force asymmetry between half-strokes. Swimming appendages normally employ both muscles and drag, but the wings of insects lack internal muscles, and their changes in shape are largely complex aeroelastic responses to the constantly changing aerodynamic and inertial loads, moderated by muscles inserted at the base. For illustration, wings modelled as thin shells with flexible hinge-lines are used to investigate how transverse distal flexion, essential for controlling the angle of attack in the upstroke, is remotely controlled by the indirect flight muscles.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Lim and M. E. DeMont Kinematics, hydrodynamics and force production of pleopods suggest jet-assisted walking in the American lobster (Homarus americanus) J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 212(17): 2731 - 2745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Dolgov, D. A. Birchfield, M. K. McBeath, H. Thornburg, and C. G. Todd Amelioration of axis-aligned motion bias for active versus stationary judgments of bilaterally symmetric moving shapes' final destinations Atten Percept Psychophys, April 1, 2009; 71(3): 523 - 529. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Vanella, T. Fitzgerald, S. Preidikman, E. Balaras, and B. Balachandran Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 95 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Flexural stiffness in insect wings II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2989 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Smith, R Herbert, R. Wootton, and K. Evans The hind wing of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskal). II. Mechanical properties and functioning of the membrane J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2000; 203(19): 2933 - 2943. [Abstract] [PDF]