spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niklas, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Spatz, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niklas, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Spatz, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 23 3273-3280, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Methods for calculating factors of safety for plant stems

KJ Niklas and H Spatz
Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. kjn2@cornell.edu

The concept of a 'factor of safety' is used by biologists and engineers who generally agree that structures must be mechanically reliable, i.e. that structures must be capable of coping with unprecedented loads without failing. These factors can be calculated for individual structures or for a population of otherwise equivalent mechanical structures differing in their load capabilities. Objective methods for quantifying factors of safety for biological structures are nevertheless difficult to devise because (1) actual (working) loads are defined by environmental conditions that can vary widely, (2) breaking loads (capability) of otherwise mechanically equivalent structures can likewise vary as a result of developmental variation, and (3) specific criteria for failure must be determined a priori. In this paper, we illustrate and discuss two methods for computing factors of safety for plants. One method works well for individual stems or entire plants, the other is useful when dealing with a population of conspecifics exhibiting a norm of reaction. Both methods require estimates of the actual and breaking bending (or torsional) moments experienced by stems, and both are amenable to dealing with any biologically reasonable criterion for failure. However, the two methods differ in terms of the assumptions made and the types of data that need to be gathered. The advantage of the first method is that it estimates the potential for survival of an individual stem or plant. The disadvantage is that it neglects natural variation among otherwise mechanically homologous individuals. The advantage of the second (statistical) approach is that it estimates the probability of survival of a population in a particular habitat. The disadvantage of this approach is that it sheds little light on the probability of an individual's survival.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Ennos
The aerodynamics and hydrodynamics of plants
J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3281 - 3284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1999