QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Arnott, S. A. Articles by Ansell, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Arnott, S. A. Articles by Ansell, A. D.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 2 193-209, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Escape trajectories of the brown shrimp crangon crangon, and a theoretical consideration of initial escape angles from predators

SA Arnott, DM Neil and AD Ansell
Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK and Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, PO Box 3, Oban, Argyll PA34 4AD, Scotland, UK. s.a.arnott@udcf.gla.ac.uk.

Tail-flip escape trajectories of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon have been investigated in response to a natural predator, the cod Gadus morhua, and an artificial stimulus. Shrimps escaped by rolling to their left or right during the initial tail-flip of a response, and thereafter swam on their side. As a result of the laterally directed first tail-flip, initial escape angles always lay between 75 degrees and 156 degrees with respect to the (pre-escape) longitudinal axis (anterior=0 degrees) of the shrimp. Symmetrical attacks from either head-on or tail-on produced escapes to the shrimp's left or right in equal proportions, although a contralateral bias did occur if the shrimp experienced a looming object from one side before a symmetrical attack was applied. Lateral attacks produced a significantly greater proportion of contralateral responses than ipsilateral ones. Empirical and theoretical analyses indicate that the initial escape direction is influenced by an interaction between the range of first tail-flip escape angles that the shrimp is capable of performing and the risk of being intercepted by a predator during the initial stage of an escape. Thus, the unpredictability ('protean behaviour') of the response may be affected by the conditions of the interaction. Subsequent tail-flips of an escape usually directed the response away from the stimulus, but sometimes escapes were instead steered to the side of the stimulus and then behind it. The probability of each type of escape occurring changed with attack direction. The elements of protean behaviour that have been identified in both the initial and subsequent stages of the escape may prevent predators from learning a fixed pattern of response, but a trade-off occurs when escape trajectories infringe upon zones of high capture risk.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Holzman, S. W. Day, and P. C. Wainwright Timing is everything: coordination of strike kinematics affects the force exerted by suction feeding fish on attached prey J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): 3328 - 3336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Preuss, P. E. Osei-Bonsu, S. A. Weiss, C. Wang, and D. S. Faber Neural representation of object approach in a decision-making motor circuit. J. Neurosci., March 29, 2006; 26(13): 3454 - 3464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Matheson, S. M. Rogers, and H. G. Krapp Plasticity in the Visual System Is Correlated With a Change in Lifestyle of Solitarious and Gregarious Locusts J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Hedenstrom and M. Rosen Predator versus prey: on aerial hunting and escape strategies in birds Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2001; 12(2): 150 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]