spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takaku, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tsukahara, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takaku, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tsukahara, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 17 2239-2244, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Ultrastructural observations of adherent cell pairs in hydra vulgaris

Y Takaku, T Hariyama, M Kurachi and Y Tsukahara
Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8577, Japan and Photodynamics Research Center, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Nagamachi, Aoba, Sendai 982-0842, Japan. takaku@biology.is.toh.

Previous morphological studies of cell sorting in Hydra vulgaris have considered only clusters of cells. Here, we present ultrastructural observations on the adherent region of cell pairs brought into contact (following dissociation) using a three-dimensional laser manipulator. There was a much larger area of close membrane contact between endodermal cell pairs in comparison with ectodermal cell pairs. Separation distances between membranes were categorized into three classes: closest distance (<4 nm); medium distance (5-25 nm); and cleavage (>25 nm). The sum of distances in the closest and medium categories as a proportion of total contact length was significantly greater (P<0.01) for endodermal cells (49.0+/-6.5 %) than for ectodermal cells (26.7+/-4. 4 %). In intact Hydra, this sum of distances was also significantly greater for endodermal cells, indicating that newly adherent cells, even after adhesion for only 10 min, display similar morphological characteristics to cells in intact Hydra. This suggests that close membrane contacts contribute to differential cell adhesion, which may form the basis of the cell sorting process.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1999