spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nievergelt, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bruderer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nievergelt, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bruderer, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 16 2225-2231, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Migratory directions of free-flying birds versus orientation in registration cages

F Nievergelt, F Liechti and B Bruderer
Swiss Ornithological Institute, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland. fraeni@access.unizh.ch

Good conditions for migration may promote offshore flights in nocturnal autumn migrants at the northern border of the Mediterranean Sea, whereas unfavourable conditions may induce flights along the coast. These predictions were tested by performing orientation cage experiments and making simultaneous observations of free-flying birds using a tracking radar. The flight directions of free-flying birds were mainly towards southwest and did not differ between overcast and clear sky conditions. The caged birds, however, tended towards southwest under clear sky and showed a more scattered distribution in the southwest and southeast quadrants under overcast conditions. Similar directional scatter occurred when the cage experiments were performed late at night. In contrast, free-flying birds shifted their flight direction towards west as night progressed to avoid flights across the sea. Flight directions observed by radar shifted slightly towards west as the season progressed owing to more frequent southeasterly winds. In orientation cages, however, directional preference was scattered towards southwest and southeast in the early migratory season and became unimodal (southwest) at the peak of the season; this change was not caused by different species composition. Consequently, there is a general coincidence of flight directions and directional preferences in orientation cages, but interpretations of results from orientation cages must allow for the possibility that experimental directions are different from migratory directions of free-flying birds, particularly under suboptimal migratory conditions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J R Soc InterfaceHome page
S. Zaugg, G. Saporta, E. van Loon, H. Schmaljohann, and F. Liechti
Automatic identification of bird targets with radar via patterns produced by wing flapping
J R Soc Interface, September 6, 2008; 5(26): 1041 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. Mouritsen and O. N. Larsen
Migrating songbirds tested in computer-controlled Emlen funnels use stellar cues for a time-independent compass
J. Exp. Biol., March 13, 2002; 204(22): 3855 - 3865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1999