QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gerber, B. Articles by Ullrich, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gerber, B. Articles by Ullrich, J.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 13 1839-1854, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning

B Gerber and J Ullrich
Institut fur Neurobiologie, Freie Universitat Berlin, Konigin-Luise-Strasse 28/30, D-14195 Berlin, Germany. bertram. gerber@unifr.ch.

We use binary odorant compounds to investigate 'blocking' in honeybees which learn to associate an odorant (A-D) with a sucrose reward as the reinforcer (+). 'Blocking' means that learning about a stimulus B is reduced when trained in compound with a stimulus A that has previously been trained alone. Thus, reinforcement of B in these circumstances is not sufficient to induce learning. Such blocking is a frequently observed phenomenon in vertebrate learning and has also recently been reported in honeybee olfactory learning. To explain blocking, current models of conditioning include cognition-like concepts of attention or expectation which, consequently, seem also to apply to honeybees. Here, we first reproduce a blocking-like effect in an experimental design taken from the literature. We identify two confounding variables in that design and experimentally demonstrate their potential to support a blocking-like effect. After eliminating these confounding variables using a series of different training procedures, the blocking-like effect disappeared. Thus, convincing evidence for blocking in honeybee classical conditioning is at present lacking. This casts doubt on the applicability of cognition-like concepts to honeybees.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Guerrieri, H. Lachnit, B. Gerber, and M. Giurfa Olfactory blocking and odorant similarity in the honeybee Learn. Mem., March 1, 2005; 12(2): 86 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-C. Sandoz, M. Hammer, and R. Menzel Side-Specificity of Olfactory Learning in the Honeybee: US Input Side Learn. Mem., September 1, 2002; 9(5): 337 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. BREMBS and M. HEISENBERG CONDITIONING WITH COMPOUND STIMULI IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN THE FLIGHT SIMULATOR J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2849 - 2859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-C. Sandoz and R. Menzel Side-Specificity of Olfactory Learning in the Honeybee: Generalization between Odors and Sides Learn. Mem., September 1, 2001; 8(5): 286 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Menzel Searching for the Memory Trace in a Mini-Brain, the Honeybee Learn. Mem., March 1, 2001; 8(2): 53 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Hosler and B. Smith Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 2000; 203(18): 2797 - 2806. [Abstract] [PDF]