|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 13 1741-1752, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
JR Lovvorn, DA Croll and GA Liggins
Department of Zoology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
For fast flapping flight of birds in air, the maximum power and efficiency of the muscles occur over a limited range of contraction speeds and loads. Thus, contraction frequency and work per stroke tend to stay constant for a given species. In birds such as auks (Alcidae) that fly both in air and under water, wingbeat frequencies in water are far lower than in air, and it is unclear to what extent contraction frequency and work per stroke are conserved. During descent, compression of air spaces dramatically lowers buoyant resistance, so that maintaining a constant contraction frequency and work per stroke should result in an increased swimming speed. However, increasing speed causes exponential increases in drag, thereby reducing mechanical versus muscle efficiency. To investigate these competing factors, we have developed a biomechanical model of diving by guillemots (Uria spp.). The model predicted swimming speeds if stroke rate and work per stroke stay constant despite changing buoyancy. We compared predicted speeds with those of a free-ranging Brunnich's guillemot (U. lomvia) fitted with a time/depth recorder. For descent, the model predicted that speed should gradually increase to an asymptote of 1.5-1.6 m s-1 at approximately 40 m depth. In contrast, the instrumented guillemot typically reached 1.5 m s-1 within 10 m of the water surface and maintained that speed throughout descent to 80 m. During ascent, the model predicted that guillemots should stroke steadily at 1.8 m s-1 below their depth of neutral buoyancy (62 m), should alternate stroking and gliding at low buoyancies from 62 to 15 m, and should ascend passively by buoyancy alone above 15 m depth. However, the instrumented guillemot typically ascended at 1.25 m s-1 when negatively buoyant, at approximately 1.5 m s-1 from 62 m to 25 m, and supplemented buoyancy with stroking above 25 m. Throughout direct descent, and during ascent at negative and low positive buoyancies (82-25 m), the guillemot maintained its speed within a narrow range that minimized the drag coefficient. In films, guillemots descending against high buoyancy at shallow depths increased their stroke frequency over that of horizontal swimming, which had a substantial glide phase. Model simulations also indicated that stroke duration, relative thrust on the downstroke versus the upstroke, and the duration of gliding can be varied to regulate swimming speed with little change in contraction speed or work per stroke. These results, and the potential use of heat from inefficient muscles for thermoregulation, suggest that diving guillemots can optimize their mechanical efficiency (drag) with little change in net physiological efficiency.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. L. Gallon, C. E. Sparling, J.-Y. Georges, M. A. Fedak, M. Biuw, and D. Thompson How fast does a seal swim? Variations in swimming behaviour under differing foraging conditions J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3285 - 3294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Heath, H. G. Gilchrist, and R. C. Ydenberg Regulation of stroke pattern and swim speed across a range of current velocities: diving by common eiders wintering in polynyas in the Canadian Arctic J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 3974 - 3983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Watanuki, S. Wanless, M. Harris, J. R. Lovvorn, M. Miyazaki, H. Tanaka, and K. Sato Swim speeds and stroke patterns in wing-propelled divers: a comparison among alcids and a penguin J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2006; 209(7): 1217 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Enstipp, D. Gremillet, and D. R. Jones The effects of depth, temperature and food ingestion on the foraging energetics of a diving endotherm, the double-crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2006; 209(5): 845 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Watanuki, A. Takahashi, F. Daunt, S. Wanless, M. Harris, K. Sato, and Y. Naito Regulation of stroke and glide in a foot-propelled avian diver J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2207 - 2216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Lovvorn, Y. Watanuki, A. Kato, Y. Naito, and G. A. Liggins Stroke patterns and regulation of swim speed and energy cost in free-ranging Brunnich's guillemots J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2004; 207(26): 4679 - 4695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Bridge The effects of intense wing molt on diving in alcids and potential influences on the evolution of molt patterns J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 3003 - 3014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ribak, D. Weihs, and Z. Arad How do cormorants counter buoyancy during submerged swimming? J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2004; 207(12): 2101 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Wilson and F. Quintana Surface pauses in relation to dive duration in imperial cormorants; how much time for a breather? J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2004; 207(11): 1789 - 1796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Williams, L. A. Fuiman, M. Horning, and R. W. Davis The cost of foraging by a marine predator, the Weddell seal Leptonychotes weddellii: pricing by the stroke J. Exp. Biol., February 22, 2004; 207(6): 973 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sato, Y. Naito, A. Kato, Y. Niizuma, Y. Watanuki, J. B. Charrassin, C.-A. Bost, Y. Handrich, and Y. Le Maho Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume? J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2002; 205(9): 1189 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Johansson and B. S. W. Aldrin Kinematics of diving Atlantic puffins (Fratercula arctica L.): evidence for an active upstroke J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 205(3): 371 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Lovvorn, G. Liggins, M. Borstad, S. Calisal, and J Mikkelsen Hydrodynamic drag of diving birds: effects of body size, body shape and feathers at steady speeds J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2001; 204(9): 1547 - 1557. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Lovvorn Upstroke Thrust, Drag Effects, and Stroke-glide Cycles in Wing-propelled Swimming by Birds Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2001; 41(2): 154 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Williams, R. W. Davis, L. A. Fuiman, J. Francis, B. J. Le Boeuf, M. Horning, J. Calambokidis, and D. A. Croll Sink or Swim: Strategies for Cost-Efficient Diving by Marine Mammals Science, April 7, 2000; 288(5463): 133 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||