|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 13 1711-1723, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
WE Conner
Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, PO Box 7325, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA. conner@wfu.edu.
Tympanal sound receptors in moths evolved in response to selective pressures provided by echolocating insectivorous bats. The presence of these ultrasound detectors also set the stage for the later evolution of ultrasonic courtship signals in the tympanate moth families. Male moths have repeatedly exploited the bat-detection mechanisms in females for the purpose of finding, identifying and obtaining mates. Ultrasonic courtship has been described in several members of the moth families Arctiidae, Noctuidae and Pyralidae, and ultrasound is predicted to play a significant role in the courtship of other tympanate moths including the Sphingidae, Lymantriidae, Notodontidae and Geometridae. Ultrasonic signals are involved in species recognition, in male-male competition for mates and in female mate-choice systems. Pre-existing motor systems, including those involved in bat defence, have also been exploited for the purpose of generating high-frequency courtship signals. Sound production mechanisms in moths include thoracic tymbals, tegular tymbals, alar castanets and genital stridulatory organs. Thus, in both their sensory and motor aspects, the weapons of bat/moth warfare have frequently evolved into components of courtship systems.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Nakano, N. Skals, T. Takanashi, A. Surlykke, T. Koike, K. Yoshida, H. Maruyama, S. Tatsuki, and Y. Ishikawa Moths produce extremely quiet ultrasonic courtship songs by rubbing specialized scales PNAS, August 19, 2008; 105(33): 11812 - 11817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Jacobs, J. M. Ratcliffe, and J. H. Fullard Beware of bats, beware of birds: the auditory responses of eared moths to bat and bird predation Behav. Ecol., July 22, 2008; (2008) arn071v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Triblehorn, K. Ghose, K. Bohn, C. F. Moss, and D. D. Yager Free-flight encounters between praying mantids (Parasphendale agrionina) and bats (Eptesicus fuscus) J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 555 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Fullard, J. M. Ratcliffe, and C. G. Christie Acoustic feature recognition in the dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2007; 210(14): 2481 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Barber and W. E. Conner Acoustic mimicry in a predator prey interaction PNAS, May 29, 2007; 104(22): 9331 - 9334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Brown, G. H. Boettner, and J. E. Yack Clicking caterpillars: acoustic aposematism in Antheraea polyphemus and other Bombycoidea J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2007; 210(6): 993 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Bostwick and R. O. Prum High-speed video analysis of wing-snapping in two manakin clades (Pipridae: Aves) J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2003; 206(20): 3693 - 3706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Surlykke, J. E. Yack, A. J. Spence, and I. Hasenfuss Hearing in hooktip moths (Drepanidae: Lepidoptera) J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2003; 206(15): 2653 - 2663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Jones, A. Barabas, W. Elliott, and S. Parsons Female greater wax moths reduce sexual display behavior in relation to the potential risk of predation by echolocating bats Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2002; 13(3): 375 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Skals and A Surlykke Sound production by abdominal tymbal organs in two moth species: the green silver-line and the scarce silver-line (Noctuoidea: Nolidae: Chloephorinae) J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 1999; 202(21): 2937 - 2949. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||