QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kramer, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kramer, B.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 10 1387-1398, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Waveform discrimination, phase sensitivity and jamming avoidance in a wave-type electric fish

B Kramer
Zoological Institute, University of Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany. bernd.kramer@biologie.uni-regensburg.de.

The electric organ discharge (EOD) of most species of the freshwater knifefishes (Gymnotiformes) of South America is of the wave, not the pulse, type. Wave EODs are usually of constant frequency and amplitude, and show a bewildering multitude of species-characteristic waveforms. The EOD of Eigenmannia is sexually dimorphic in waveform and in the intensity of its higher harmonics. In a go/no go paradigm, trained food-rewarded fish discriminated between these waveforms, and naive (untrained) fish showed a significant preference. To determine whether spectral or waveform (time) cues are used by the fish, artificial stimuli of identical amplitude spectrum were synthesized that differed only in phase relationship between their harmonics, i.e. waveform, and the fish discriminated even among these stimulus waveforms (i.e. spectral cues are not required). Our sensory model predicts that, for successful waveform detection, a minimum frequency difference is required between the stimulus and the EOD. As expected, trained fish confused test stimuli of different waveform that were frequency-clamped and phase-locked to the EOD (frequency difference 0 Hz). Opening the electronic feedback loop immediately restored discrimination performance on an on/off basis, and a strong jamming avoidance response (JAR; a frequency shift away from the stimulus) accompanied every behavioural decision (to go for a food reward). The strong habituation of the JAR that occurs in response to stimuli of no behavioural consequence (the usual test situation) was not seen in the present experiments. The proposed sensory model (which is based on time-marking T electroreceptors) is supported by these experiments, and a biological function for the JAR - subserving EOD waveform discrimination is shown to be useful in a social context.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Machnik and B. Kramer Female choice by electric pulse duration: attractiveness of the males' communication signal assessed by female bulldog fish, Marcusenius pongolensis (Mormyridae, Teleostei) J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): 1969 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Bastian, S. Schniederjan, and J. Nguyenkim Arginine Vasotocin Modulates a Sexually Dimorphic Communication Behavior in the Weakly Electric fish APTERONOTUS LEPTORHYNCHUS J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2001; 204(11): 1909 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hopkins Design features for electric communication J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 1999; 202(10): 1217 - 1228. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W Metzner Neural circuitry for communication and jamming avoidance in gymnotiform electric fish J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 1999; 202(10): 1365 - 1375. [Abstract] [PDF]