|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 10 1205-1215, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
G von der Emde
Institut fur Zoologie, Universitat Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, Germany. GvonderEmde@UNI-BONN.DE.
Weakly electric fish produce electric signals (electric organ discharges, EODs) with a specialised electric organ creating an electric field around their body. Objects within this field alter the EOD-induced current at epidermal electroreceptor organs, which are distributed over almost the entire body surface. The detection, localisation and analysis of objects performed by monitoring self-produced electric signals is called active electrolocation. Electric fish employ active electrolocation to detect objects that are less than 12 cm away and have electric properties that are different from those of the surrounding water. Within this range, the mormyrid Gnathonemus petersii can also perceive the distance of objects. Depth perception is independent of object parameters such as size, shape and material. The mechanism for distance determination through electrolocation involves calculating the ratio between two parameters of the electric image that the object projects onto the fish's skin. Electric fish can not only locate objects but can also analyse their electrical properties. Fish are informed about object impedance by measuring local amplitude changes at their receptor organs evoked by an object. In addition, all electric fish studied so far can independently determine the capacitative and resistive components of objects that possess complex impedances. This ability allows the fish to discriminate between living and non-living matter, because capacitance is a property of living organisms. African mormyrids and South American gymnotiforms use different mechanisms for capacitance detection. Mormyrids detect capacitance-evoked EOD waveform distortions, whereas gymnotiforms perform time measurements. Gymnotiforms measure the temporal phase shift of their EODs induced at body parts close to the object relative to unaffected body parts further away.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. G.D Feulner, M. Plath, J. Engelmann, F. Kirschbaum, and R. Tiedemann Electrifying love: electric fish use species-specific discharge for mate recognition Biol Lett, April 23, 2009; 5(2): 225 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Y. Wong and C. D. Hopkins Electrical and behavioral courtship displays in the mormyrid fish Brienomyrus brachyistius J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2244 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Babineau, A. Longtin, and J. E. Lewis Modeling the electric field of weakly electric fish J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3636 - 3651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Carlson and M. Kawasaki Ambiguous Encoding of Stimuli by Primary Sensory Afferents Causes a Lack of Independence in the Perception of Multiple Stimulus Attributes J. Neurosci., September 6, 2006; 26(36): 9173 - 9183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Arnegard, B. S. Jackson, and C. D. Hopkins Time-domain signal divergence and discrimination without receptor modification in sympatric morphs of electric fishes J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 209(11): 2182 - 2198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E Arnegard and B. A Carlson Electric organ discharge patterns during group hunting by a mormyrid fish Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2005; 272(1570): 1305 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Aguilera and A. A. Caputi Electroreception in G. carapo: detection of changes in waveform of the electrosensory signals J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2003; 206(6): 989 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schuster and N. Otto Sensitivity to novel feedback at different phases of a gymnotid electric organ discharge J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2002; 205(21): 3307 - 3320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schuster Behavioral evidence for post-pause reduced responsiveness in the electrosensory system of Gymnotus carapo J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2525 - 2533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schuster and S. Amtsfeld Template-matching describes visual pattern-recognition tasks in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2002; 205(4): 549 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Lewis and L. Maler Neuronal Population Codes and the Perception of Object Distance in Weakly Electric Fish J. Neurosci., April 15, 2001; 21(8): 2842 - 2850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. MacIver, N. Sharabash, and M. Nelson Prey-capture behavior in gymnotid electric fish: motion analysis and effects of water conductivity J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2001; 204(3): 543 - 557. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. von der Emde, L. G. Sena, R. Niso, and K. Grant The Midbrain Precommand Nucleus of the Mormyrid Electromotor Network J. Neurosci., July 15, 2000; 20(14): 5483 - 5495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kreiman, R. Krahe, W. Metzner, C. Koch, and F. Gabbiani Robustness and Variability of Neuronal Coding by Amplitude-Sensitive Afferents in the Weakly Electric Fish Eigenmannia J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 189 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nelson and M. Maciver Prey capture in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus albifrons: sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory consequences J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 1999; 202(10): 1195 - 1203. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Turner and L Maler Oscillatory and burst discharge in the apteronotid electrosensory lateral line lobe J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 1999; 202(10): 1255 - 1265. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pettigrew Electroreception in monotremes J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 1999; 202(10): 1447 - 1454. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||