|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 4 461-477, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
H. Liu, C. P. Ellington, K. Kawachi, C. Van Den Berg and A. P. Willmott
A computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modelling approach is used to study the unsteady aerodynamics of the flapping wing of a hovering hawkmoth. We use the geometry of a Manduca sexta-based robotic wing to define the shape of a three-dimensional 'virtual' wing model and 'hover' this wing, mimicking accurately the three-dimensional movements of the wing of a hovering hawkmoth. Our CFD analysis has established an overall understanding of the viscous and unsteady flow around the flapping wing and of the time course of instantaneous force production, which reveals that hovering flight is dominated by the unsteady aerodynamics of both the instantaneous dynamics and also the past history of the wing. A coherent leading-edge vortex with axial flow was detected during translational motions of both the up- and downstrokes. The attached leading-edge vortex causes a negative pressure region and, hence, is responsible for enhancing lift production. The axial flow, which is derived from the spanwise pressure gradient, stabilises the vortex and gives it a characteristic spiral conical shape. The leading-edge vortex created during previous translational motion remains attached during the rotational motions of pronation and supination. This vortex, however, is substantially deformed due to coupling between the translational and rotational motions, develops into a complex structure, and is eventually shed before the subsequent translational motion. Estimation of the forces during one complete flapping cycle shows that lift is produced mainly during the downstroke and the latter half of the upstroke, with little force generated during pronation and supination. The stroke plane angle that satisfies the horizontal force balance of hovering is 23.6 °, which shows excellent agreement with observed angles of approximately 20-25 °. The time-averaged vertical force is 40 % greater than that needed to support the weight of the hawkmoth.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Lu and G. X. Shen Three-dimensional flow structures and evolution of the leading-edge vortices on a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1221 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Aono, F. Liang, and H. Liu Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 239 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lu, G. X. Shen, and G. J. Lai Dual leading-edge vortices on flapping wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2006; 209(24): 5005 - 5016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Hedrick and T. L. Daniel Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): 3114 - 3130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Sane Induced airflow in flying insects I. A theoretical model of the induced flow J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 32 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Usherwood, T. L. Hedrick, C. P. McGowan, and A. A. Biewener Dynamic pressure maps for wings and tails of pigeons in slow, flapping flight, and their energetic implications J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 355 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin When vortices stick: an aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 3073 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Hedrick, J. R. Usherwood, and A. A. Biewener Wing inertia and whole-body acceleration: an analysis of instantaneous aerodynamic force production in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) flying across a range of speeds J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2004; 207(10): 1689 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Wu and M. Sun Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1137 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. J. Wang, J. M. Birch, and M. H. Dickinson Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 449 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Flexural stiffness in insect wings II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2989 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2999 - 3006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sun and J. H. Wu Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 3065 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Birch and M. H. Dickinson The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 206(13): 2257 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Liu Computational Biological Fluid Dynamics: Digitizing and Visualizing Animal Swimming and Flying Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2002; 42(5): 1050 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Usherwood and C. P. Ellington The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1547 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2002; 205(8): 1087 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Shape, flapping and flexion: wing and fin design for forward flight J. Exp. Biol., March 8, 2002; 204(12): 2073 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Walker and M. W. Westneat Performance limits of labriform propulsion and correlates with fin shape and motion J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2002; 205(2): 177 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sun and J. Tang Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2002; 205(1): 55 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2001; 204(15): 2607 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Drucker and G. Lauder Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 1999; 202(18): 2393 - 2412. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Schilstra and J. Hateren Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 1999; 202(11): 1481 - 1490. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||