|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 3 385-401, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
F-O. Lehmann and M. H. Dickinson
By simultaneously measuring flight forces and stroke kinematics in several species of fruit flies in the genus Drosophila, we have investigated the relationship between wing motion and aerodynamic force production. We induced tethered flies to vary their production of total flight force by presenting them with a vertically oscillating visual background within a closed-loop flight arena. In response to the visual motion, flies modulated their flight force by changing the translational velocity of their wings, which they accomplished via changes in both stroke amplitude and stroke frequency. Changes in wing velocity could not, however, account for all the modulation in flight force, indicating that the mean force coefficient of the wings also increases with increasing force production. The mean force coefficients were always greater than those expected under steady-state conditions under a variety of assumptions, verifying that force production in Drosophila spp. must involve non-steady-state mechanisms. The subtle changes in kinematics and force production within individual flight sequences demonstrate that flies possess a flexible control system for flight maneuvers in which they can independently control the stroke amplitude, stroke frequency and force coefficient of their wings. By studying four different-sized species, we examined the effects of absolute body size on the production and control of aerodynamic forces. With decreasing body size, the mean angular wing velocity that is required to support the body weight increases. This change is due almost entirely to an increase in stroke frequency, whereas mean stroke amplitude was similar in all four species. Despite the elevated stroke frequency and angular wing velocity, the translational velocity of the wings in small flies decreases with the reduction in absolute wing length. To compensate for their small size, D. nikananu must use higher mean force coefficients than their larger relatives.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. M. Chow and M. A. Frye Context-dependent olfactory enhancement of optomotor flight control in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2478 - 2485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Hesselberg and F.-O. Lehmann Turning behaviour depends on frictional damping in the fruit fly Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4319 - 4334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann and S. Pick The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1362 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Tanaka and K. Kawachi Response characteristics of visual altitude control system in Bombus terrestris J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): 4533 - 4545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Heymann and F.-O. Lehmann The significance of spiracle conductance and spatial arrangement for flight muscle function and aerodynamic performance in flying Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1662 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann and N. Heymann Unconventional mechanisms control cyclic respiratory gas release in flying Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2005; 208(19): 3645 - 3654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann, S. P. Sane, and M. Dickinson The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3075 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. Fry, R. Sayaman, and M. H. Dickinson The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2303 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Barton, G. Ayer, N. Heymann, D. W. Maughan, F.-O. Lehmann, and J. O. Vigoreaux Flight muscle properties and aerodynamic performance of Drosophila expressing a flightin transgene J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2005; 208(3): 549 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Maybury and F.-O. Lehmann The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2004; 207(26): 4707 - 4726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Roberts, J. F. Harrison, and R. Dudley Allometry of kinematics and energetics in carpenter bees (Xylocopa varipuncta) hovering in variable-density gases J. Exp. Biol., February 22, 2004; 207(6): 993 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Dillon and R. Dudley Allometry of maximum vertical force production during hovering flight of neotropical orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini) J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 417 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Fischer, H. Wolf, and A. Buschges The locust tegula: kinematic parameters and activity pattern during the wing stroke J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1531 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Dudley Mechanisms and Implications of Animal Flight Maneuverability Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 42(1): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2001; 204(15): 2607 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Lehmann and M. Dickinson The production of elevated flight force compromises manoeuvrability in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2001; 204(4): 627 - 635. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Lehmann, M. Dickinson, and J Staunton The scaling of carbon dioxide release and respiratory water loss in flying fruit flies (Drosophila spp.) J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 2000; 203(10): 1613 - 1624. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Schilstra and J. Hateren Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 1999; 202(11): 1481 - 1490. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. P. Chan, F. Prete, and M. H. Dickinson Visual Input to the Efferent Control System of a Fly's "Gyroscope" Science, April 10, 1998; 280(5361): 289 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
