QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Corning, W. R. Articles by Biewener, A. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Corning, W. R. Articles by Biewener, A. A.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 22 3057-3065, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

In vivo strains in pigeon flight feather shafts: implications for structural design

WR Corning and AA Biewener
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. abiewener@oeb.harvard.edu.

To evaluate the safety factor for flight feather shafts, in vivo strains were recorded during free flight from the dorsal surface of a variety of flight feathers of captive pigeons (Columba livia) using metal foil strain gauges. Strains recorded while the birds flew at a slow speed (approximately 5-6 m s-1) were used to calculate functional stresses on the basis of published values for the elastic modulus of feather keratin. These stresses were then compared with measurements of the failure stress obtained from four-point bending tests of whole sections of the rachis at a similar location. Recorded strains followed an oscillatory pattern, changing from tensile strain during the upstroke to compressive strain during the downstroke. Peak compressive strains were 2.2+/-0. 9 times (mean +/- s.d.) greater than peak tensile strains. Tensile strain peaks were generally not as large in more proximal flight feathers. Maximal compressive strains averaged -0.0033+/-0.0012 and occurred late in the downstroke. Bending tests demonstrated that feather shafts are most likely to fail through local buckling of their compact keratin cortex. A comparison of the mean (8.3 MPa) and maximum (15.7 MPa) peak stresses calculated from the in vivo strain recordings with the mean failure stress measured in four-point bending (137 MPa) yields a safety factor of between 9 and 17. Under more strenuous flight conditions, feather stresses are estimated to be 1.4-fold higher, reducing their safety factor to the range 6-12. These values seem high, considering that the safety factor of the humerus of pigeons has been estimated to be between 1.9 and 3.5. Several hypotheses explaining this difference in safety factor are considered, but the most reasonable explanation appears to be that flexural stiffness is more critical than strength to feather shaft performance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Warrick, C. J. Clark, D. R. Powers, T. L. Hedrick, G. A. Hyder, and A. A. Biewener Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2368 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Butler and A. S. Johnson Are melanized feather barbs stronger? J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2004; 207(2): 285 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Usherwood, T. L. Hedrick, and A. A. Biewener The aerodynamics of avian take-off from direct pressure measurements in Canada geese (Branta canadensis) J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 4051 - 4056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Tobalske and K. Dial Effects of body size on take-off flight performance in the Phasianidae (Aves) J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2000; 203(21): 3319 - 3332. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Tobalske, W. Peacock, and K. Dial Kinematics of flap-bounding flight in the zebra finch over a wide range of speeds J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(13): 1725 - 1739. [Abstract] [PDF]