spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Farley, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Farley, C. T.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 21 2935-2944, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Determinants of the center of mass trajectory in human walking and running

CR Lee and CT Farley
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720-3140, USA.

Walking is often modeled as an inverted pendulum system in which the center of mass vaults over the rigid stance limb. Running is modeled as a simple spring-mass system in which the center of mass bounces along on the compliant stance limb. In these models, differences in stance-limb behavior lead to nearly opposite patterns of vertical movements of the center of mass in the two gaits. Our goal was to quantify the importance of stance-limb behavior and other factors in determining the trajectory of the center of mass during walking and running. We collected kinematic and force platform data during human walking and running. Virtual stance-limb compression (i.e. reduction in the distance between the point of foot-ground contact and the center of mass during the first half of the stance phase) was only 26% lower for walking (0.091 m) than for running (0.123 m) at speeds near the gait transition speed. In spite of this relatively small difference, the center of mass moved upwards by 0.031 m during the first half of the stance phase during walking and moved downwards by 0.073 m during the first half of the stance phase during running. The most important reason for this difference was that the stance limb swept through a larger angle during walking (30.4 degrees) than during running (19.2 degrees). We conclude that stance-limb touchdown angle and virtual stance-limb compression both play important roles in determining the trajectory of the center of mass and whether a gait is a walk or a run.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. K. De Witt, R. D. Hagan, and R. L. Cromwell
The effect of increasing inertia upon vertical ground reaction forces and temporal kinematics during locomotion
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2008; 211(7): 1087 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. Herr and M. Popovic
Angular momentum in human walking
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 467 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. P. Ivanenko, G. Cappellini, N. Dominici, R. E. Poppele, and F. Lacquaniti
Modular Control of Limb Movements during Human Locomotion
J. Neurosci., October 10, 2007; 27(41): 11149 - 11161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. Segers, P. Aerts, M. Lenoir, and D. De Clerq
Dynamics of the body centre of mass during actual acceleration across transition speed
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2007; 210(4): 578 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. E. Vereecke, K. D'Aout, and P. Aerts
The dynamics of hylobatid bipedalism: evidence for an energy-saving mechanism?
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2829 - 2838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Cappellini, Y. P. Ivanenko, R. E. Poppele, and F. Lacquaniti
Motor Patterns in Human Walking and Running
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3426 - 3437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Ortega and C. T. Farley
Minimizing center of mass vertical movement increases metabolic cost in walking
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2099 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. J. Robilliard and A. M. Wilson
Prediction of kinetics and kinematics of running animals using an analytical approximation to the planar spring-mass system
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2005; 208(23): 4377 - 4389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. A. Biewener, C. T. Farley, T. J. Roberts, and M. Temaner
Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2004; 97(6): 2266 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y. P. Ivanenko, N. Dominici, G. Cappellini, B. Dan, G. Cheron, and F. Lacquaniti
Development of pendulum mechanism and kinematic coordination from the first unsupported steps in toddlers
J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2004; 207(21): 3797 - 3810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. M. Griffin, R. P. Main, and C. T. Farley
Biomechanics of quadrupedal walking: how do four-legged animals achieve inverted pendulum-like movements?
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2004; 207(20): 3545 - 3558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. Schmitt
Insights into the evolution of human bipedalism from experimental studies of humans and other primates
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2003; 206(9): 1437 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Donelan and R Kram
Exploring dynamic similarity in human running using simulated reduced gravity
J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2000; 203(16): 2405 - 2415.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1998