QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Winter, Y. Articles by Von Helversen, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Winter, Y. Articles by Von Helversen, O. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 2 237-244, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Gas exchange during hovering flight in a nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina

Y Winter, C Voigt and O Von Helversen
Institute of Zoology II, Erlangen University, Erlangen, Germany. ywinter@biologie.uni-erlangen.de

Glossophagine nectar-feeding bats exploit flowers while hovering in front of them. Aerodynamic theory predicts that power output for hovering flight in Glossophaga soricina is 2.6 times higher than during horizontal flight. We tested this prediction by measuring rates of gas exchange during hover-feeding. Five individuals of Glossophaga soricina (mean mass 11.7 g) were trained to feed from a nectar dispenser designed as a flow-through respirometry mask. Single hover-feeding events lasted for up to 4.5 s. Measured rates of gas exchange varied as a function of hovering duration. O2 and CO2 during short hovering events (up to 1 s) were 20.5+/-6.7 ml g-1 h-1 (N=55) and 21.6+/-5.6 ml g-1 h-1 (N=39) (means +/- S.D.), respectively. These values are in the range of a previous estimate of the metabolic power input for level forward flight (23.8 ml O2 g-1 h-1). However, during hovering events lasting longer than 3 s, oxygen uptake was only 16.7+/-3.5 ml g-1 h-1 (N=73), which is only 70 % of the value expected for forward flight. Thus, bats reduced their rate of oxygen uptake during longer periods of hovering compared with level forward flight. This result is in contrast to the predicted hovering cost derived from aerodynamic theory. The exact metabolic power input during hovering remains uncertain. During longer hovering events, bats were probably not in respiratory steady state, as indicated by the deviation of the respiratory exchange ratio from the expected value of 1 (oxidization of nectar sugar) to the measured value of 0.8.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Canals, C. Atala, R. Olivares, F. Guajardo, D. P. Figueroa, P. Sabat, and M. Rosenmann Functional and structural optimization of the respiratory system of the bat Tadarida brasiliensis (Chiroptera, Molossidae): does airway geometry matter? J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2005; 208(20): 3987 - 3995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Dudley and Y. Winter Hovering flight mechanics of neotropical flower bats (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) in normodense and hypodense gas mixtures J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 205(23): 3669 - 3677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y Winter Flight speed and body mass of nectar-feeding bats (Glossophaginae) during foraging J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(14): 1917 - 1930. [Abstract] [PDF]