spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legros, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cattaert, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legros, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cattaert, D.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 18 2625-2636, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

The myth of scorpion suicide: are scorpions insensitive to their own venom?

C Legros, MF Martin-Eauclaire and D Cattaert
Laboratoire de Biochimie, Unite Mixte de Recherche 6560 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Federatif de Recherche Jean Roche, Universite de la Mediterranee, Faculte de Medecine Secteur Nord, Boulevard Pierre Drama.

The resistance of the scorpion Androctonus australis to its own venom, as well as to the venom of other species, was investigated. A comparison of the electrical and pharmacological properties of muscle and nerve fibres from Androctonus australis with those from the crayfish Procambarus clarkii enabled us to understand the lack of effect of scorpion venom (110-180 microg ml-1) and purified toxins, which are active on voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels, Ca2+-activated K+ channels, on scorpion tissues. Voltage-clamp experiments showed that peptide K+ channel blockers from scorpion and snake have no effect on currents in muscle and nerve fibres from either scorpions or crayfish. The scorpion toxin kaliotoxin (KTX), a specific blocker of Kv1.1 and Kv1.3 K+ channels, had no effect on muscle fibres of A. australis (2 micromol l-1) or P. clarkii (400 nmol l-1). Similarly, charybdotoxin (ChTX) had no effect on the muscle fibres of A. australis (10 micromol l-1) or P. clarkii (200 nmol l-1) and neither did the snake toxin dendrotoxin (DTX) at concentrations of 100 nmol l-1 in A. australis and 200 nmol l-1 in P. clarkii. These three toxins (KTX, ChTX and DTX) did not block K+ currents recorded from nerve fibres in P. clarkii. The pharmacology of the K+ channels in these two arthropods did not conform to that previously described for K+ channels in other species. Current-clamp experiments clearly indicated that the venom of A. australis (50 microg ml-1) had no effect on the shape of the action potential recorded from nerve cord axons from A. australis. At a concentration of 50 microg ml-1, A. australis venom greatly prolonged the action potential in the crayfish giant axon. The absence of any effect of the anti-mammal <IMG src="/images/symbols/&agr ;.gif" WIDTH="9" HEIGHT="12" ALIGN="BOTTOM" NATURALSIZEFLAG="3">-toxin AaH II (100 nmol l-1) and the anti-insect toxin AaH IT1 (100 nmol l-1) on scorpion nerve fibres revealed strong pharmacological differences between the voltage-gated Na+ channels of scorpion and crayfish. We conclude that the venom from A. australis is pharmacologically inactive on K+ channels and on voltage-sensitive Na+ channels from this scorpion.




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1998