spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jofriet, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jofriet, J. C.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 15 2287-2297, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Stress/strain behaviour of the equine laminar junction

JE Douglas, TL Biddick, JJ Thomason and JC Jofriet
Equine Research Centre and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1. jed21@bellatlantic.net

The equine laminar junction plays a vital role in transferring the forces of weight-bearing between the epidermal hoof wall and the bone of the third phalanx, but the way in which it performs this function is poorly understood. Using samples from sites varying proximodistally and circumferentially around the hoof, the stress/strain behaviour of this tissue was characterised in three directions: radial tension and proximodistal and mediolateral shear. The influences of toe angle and length were also examined. For all three test directions, the modulus of elasticity increased with increasing strain magnitude. The mean modulus of elasticity in tension was 18.25+/-5.38 MPa (mean +/-1 S.D., N=116; mean strain 0. 25). In proximodistal shear, the mean shear modulus was 5.38+/-1.49 MPa (N=76; mean shear strain 0.48) and in mediolateral shear 2. 57+/-0.91 MPa (N=66; mean shear strain 0.81). In many cases, the individual hoof or horse from which the samples were taken significantly affected the value of the modulus, suggesting that mechanical history may affect the material properties of this tissue. Few biologically significant variations with location, toe length or toe angle were unambiguously demonstrated, suggesting that the material properties of the laminar junction are independent of position, despite apparent regional variations in function, and that foot shape is not a major determinant of material properties.




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1998