|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 14 2115-2128, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
AA Caputi, R Budelli, K Grant and CC Bell
Division Neuroanatomia Comparada, Instituto de Investigaciones Biologicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay.
The present study describes a measurement-based model of electric image generation in the weakly electric mormyrid fish Gnathonemus petersii. Measurements of skin impedance, internal resistivity and fish body dimensions have been used to generate an electrical-equivalent model of the fish and to calculate electrical images and equivalent dipole sources for elementary resistive objects. These calculations allow us to understand how exafferent and reafferent signals are sensed by electroreceptors. An object's electric image consists of the modulation of the transcutaneous voltage profile generated by the fish's own discharge. The results suggest a set of rules for electrolocation: (1) the side of the fish where modulation is larger indicates the side on which the object is situated; (2) the object's position in the electroreceptive field is indicated by the point of maximum modulation of the transcutaneous voltage; (3) the degree of focus of the image indicates the distance to the object. In addition, center-surround opposition originating at pre-receptor level is proposed.Both experimental measurements and modeling indicate that fish skin impedance is relatively low (400-11 000 <IMG src="/images/symbols/capomega.gif" WIDTH="13" HEIGHT="13" ALIGN="BOTTOM" NATURALSIZEFLAG="3">cm<SUP>2</SUP>) and mainly resistive. This low skin impedance appears to enhance the local electric organ discharge modulation, the center-surround effect, the signal-to-noise ratio for electrolocation and the active space for electrocommunication.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. R. Pluta and M. Kawasaki Multisensory enhancement of electromotor responses to a single moving object J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2008; 211(18): 2919 - 2930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pusch, G. von der Emde, M. Hollmann, J. Bacelo, S. Nobel, K. Grant, and J. Engelmann Active sensing in a mormyrid fish: electric images and peripheral modifications of the signal carrier give evidence of dual foveation J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2008; 211(6): 921 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. von der Emde and S. Fetz Distance, shape and more: recognition of object features during active electrolocation in a weakly electric fish J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 3082 - 3095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Babineau, A. Longtin, and J. E. Lewis Modeling the electric field of weakly electric fish J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3636 - 3651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gomez, R. Budelli, K. Grant, and A. A. Caputi Pre-receptor profile of sensory images and primary afferent neuronal representation in the mormyrid electrosensory system J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2004; 207(14): 2443 - 2453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Caputi, P. A. Aguilera, and M. E. Castello Probability and amplitude of novelty responses as a function of the change in contrast of the reafferent image in G. carapo J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2003; 206(6): 999 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Aguilera, M. Castello, and A. Caputi Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: differences between self-generated and conspecific-generated signal carriers J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2001; 204(2): 185 - 198. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Budelli and A. Caputi The electric image in weakly electric fish: perception of objects of complex impedance J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2000; 203(3): 481 - 492. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G von der Emde Active electrolocation of objects in weakly electric fish J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 1999; 202(10): 1205 - 1215. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||