spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lejeune, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heglund, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lejeune, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heglund, N. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 13 2071-2080, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand

TM Lejeune, PA Willems and NC Heglund
Universite catholique de Louvain, Place P. de Coubertin, Belgium.

Moving about in nature often involves walking or running on a soft yielding substratum such as sand, which has a profound effect on the mechanics and energetics of locomotion. Force platform and cinematographic analyses were used to determine the mechanical work performed by human subjects during walking and running on sand and on a hard surface. Oxygen consumption was used to determine the energetic cost of walking and running under the same conditions. Walking on sand requires 1.6-2.5 times more mechanical work than does walking on a hard surface at the same speed. In contrast, running on sand requires only 1.15 times more mechanical work than does running on a hard surface at the same speed. Walking on sand requires 2.1-2.7 times more energy expenditure than does walking on a hard surface at the same speed; while running on sand requires 1.6 times more energy expenditure than does running on a hard surface. The increase in energy cost is due primarily to two effects: the mechanical work done on the sand, and a decrease in the efficiency of positive work done by the muscles and tendons.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. E. di Prampero, D. Salvadego, S. Fusi, and B. Grassi
A simple method for assessing the energy cost of running during incremental tests
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2009; 107(4): 1068 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
F M Impellizzeri, E Rampinini, C Castagna, F Martino, S Fiorini, and U Wisloff
Effect of plyometric training on sand versus grass on muscle soreness and jumping and sprinting ability in soccer players
Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 42(1): 42 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. M. Dudek and R. J. Full
Passive mechanical properties of legs from running insects
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2006; 209(8): 1502 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. P. Ivanenko, N. Dominici, G. Cappellini, and F. Lacquaniti
Kinematics in Newly Walking Toddlers Does Not Depend Upon Postural Stability
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 754 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. T. Moritz, S. M. Greene, and C. T. Farley
Neuromuscular changes for hopping on a range of damped surfaces
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2004; 96(5): 1996 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. Kohlsdorf, R. S. James, J. E. Carvalho, R. S. Wilson, M. Dal Pai-Silva, and C. A. Navas
Locomotor performance of closely related Tropidurus species: relationships with physiological parameters and ecological divergence
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1183 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. T. Hsieh
Three-dimensional hindlimb kinematics of water running in the plumed basilisk lizard (Basiliscus plumifrons)
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4363 - 4377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. J. Bastien, N. C. Heglund, and B. Schepens
The double contact phase in walking children
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2967 - 2978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Minetti, C. Moia, G. S. Roi, D. Susta, and G. Ferretti
Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2002; 93(3): 1039 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Dudley
Limits to human locomotor performance: phylogenetic origins and comparative perspectives
J. Exp. Biol., March 11, 2002; 204(18): 3235 - 3240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Kerdok, A. A. Biewener, T. A. McMahon, P. G. Weyand, and H. M. Herr
Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2002; 92(2): 469 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. H. Dickinson, C. T. Farley, R. J. Full, M. A. Koehl, R. Kram, and S. Lehman
How Animals Move: An Integrative View
Science, April 7, 2000; 288(5463): 100 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1998