QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Matheson, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Matheson, T.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 201, Issue 13 2021-2032, Copyright © 1998 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Contralateral coordination and retargeting of limb movements during scratching in the locust

T Matheson
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. tm114@hermes.cam.ac.uk.

Locusts, Schistocerca gregaria, in common with many limbed vertebrates, can make directed scratching movements in response to tactile stimulation. For instance, stimulation of different sites on a wing elicits different movements that are accurately targeted so that the hindleg tarsus passes across the stimulus site. I have analysed these limb movements to define the ability of a locust to target stimulus sites correctly under a range of experimental conditions. In particular, I describe aspects of the behaviour that reveal possible neuronal pathways underlying the responses. These neuronal pathways will be the subject of further physiological analyses. Limb targeting during scratching is continuously graded in form; different patterns of movement are not separated by sharp transitions. The computation of limb trajectory takes into account the starting posture of the hindleg, so that different trajectories can be used to reach a common stimulus site from different starting postures. Moreover, the trajectories of the two hindlegs moving simultaneously from different starting postures in response to a single stimulus can be different, so that their tarsi converge onto the common stimulus site. Different trajectories can be used to reach a common stimulus site from the same start posture. Targeting information from a forewing is passed not only down the nerve cord to the ipsilateral hindleg but also across the nerve cord, so that the contralateral hindleg can also make directed movements. This contralateral transmission does not rely on peripheral sensory feedback. When the stimulus site moves during a rhythmical scratch, the targeting of subsequent cycles reflects this change. Both ipsilateral and contralateral hindlegs can retarget their movements. The trajectory of a single cycle of scratching directed towards a particular stimulus site can be modified after it has begun, so that the tarsus is redirected towards a new stimulus site.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. Page, J. Zakotnik, V. Durr, and T. Matheson Motor Control of Aimed Limb Movements in an Insect J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 484 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Page and T. Matheson Wing hair sensilla underlying aimed hindleg scratching of the locust J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2004; 207(15): 2691 - 2703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Matheson and V. Durr Load compensation in targeted limb movements of an insect J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2003; 206(18): 3175 - 3186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Durr and T. Matheson Graded Limb Targeting in an Insect Is Caused by the Shift of a Single Movement Pattern J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1754 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Hassenstein and R Hustert Hiding responses of locusts to approaching objects J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 1999; 202(12): 1701 - 1710. [Abstract]