spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buschman, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Elzinga, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buschman, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Elzinga, G.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 200, Issue 3 523-529, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Variation in normalized isometric tetanic force of isolated fast-twitch muscle fibres of Rana temporaria

HP Buschman, WJ van der Laarse, GJ Stienen and G Elzinga
Laboratory for Physiology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. buschman@mit.edu

The origin of the threefold variation found previously in isometric force normalized to cross-sectional area of single fast-twitch tibialis anterior muscle fibres of the frog Rana temporaria was studied by using (1) a strictly defined stimulus protocol, and (2) influencing the condition of the frog using artificial hibernation. Variation in normalized force was found to be influenced by the length of the rest period between tetani. After a long rest (> 6h), tetanic force production was less than for a tetanus produced after 1 h. The length of the rest period accounted for a factor of 1.24 of the total variation in normalized force. The condition of the frog also influenced normalized force production. Little variation in normalized force was observed between different fibres from the same animal, whereas a significant difference was found between animals. After artificial hibernation, force normalized to cross-sectional area remained unchanged, but force normalized to dry mass per unit length increased; the total variation increased from a factor of 1.37 to a factor of 1.64. Force normalized to muscle protein mass per unit length, however, was not affected by artificial hibernation. We conclude that variation in normalized tetanic force can be partly reduced by standardization of the stimulation protocol and normalization to protein content per unit length.




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1997