spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gee, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmer-Faust, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gee, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmer-Faust, R. K.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 200, Issue 24 3185-3192, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

The effects of walls, paternity and ageing on sperm motility

CC Gee and RK Zimmer-Faust
Marine Sciences Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. ccgee@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu

The measurement of sperm motility is critical when studying fertilization kinetics and chemotaxis. Analysis of motility has traditionally been carried out on cells in small fluid volumes on microscope slides. Several theoretical treatments suggest that drag forces significantly affect flagellar motion within 10 sperm body lengths of the slide surface. Understanding how sperm move in the absence of surface drag is crucial when considering natural locomotory patterns. To examine the effects of solid surfaces, motile sperm from sea urchins (Arbacia punctulata) were placed in a Plexiglas chamber (69 mmx45 mmx15.5 mm; length x width x height). A system was constructed to minimize convective flow by limiting temperature differences within the chamber to less than 0.1 degrees C. The movement of sperm was video-recorded at two levels: (3/4)100 micron (3 body lengths) and 5 mm (150 body lengths) below the chamber lid. When swimming speeds were measured using a computerized video motion-analysis system, a highly significant difference (P<0. 0001) between cells at the two depths was found. Cells nearest the lid swam at 174.6+/-5.9 micron s-1 (mean +/- s.e.m.), whereas those farther away slowed to only 111.1+/-9.9 micron s-1 (mean +/- s.e.m.). Swimming speed was also found to be significantly (P<0.01) affected by paternity, but not by sperm age. We conclude that viscous wall effects must be carefully considered in studies of sperm motility and chemotaxis. The analysis of sperm on a microscope slide may substantially exaggerate swimming speed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Riffell and R. K. Zimmer
Sex and flow: the consequences of fluid shear for sperm egg interactions
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3644 - 3660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. D. Podolsky
Fertilization ecology of egg coats: physical versus chemical contributions to fertilization success of free-spawned eggs
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1657 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Riffell, P. J. Krug, and R. K. Zimmer
Fertilization in the sea: the chemical identity of an abalone sperm attractant
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2002; 205(10): 1439 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1997