spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makanya, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Burri, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makanya, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Burri, P. H.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 200, Issue 18 2415-2423, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

A stereological comparison of villous and microvillous surfaces in small intestines of frugivorous and entomophagous bats: species, inter-individual and craniocaudal differences

AN Makanya, JN Maina, TM Mayhew, SA Tschanz and PH Burri
Institute of Anatomy, University of Berne, Switzerland. makanya@ana.unibe.ch

The extents of functional surfaces (villi, microvilli) have been estimated at different longitudinal sites, and in the entire small intestine, for three species of bats belonging to two feeding groups: insect- and fruit-eaters. In all species, surface areas and other structural quantities tended to be greatest at more cranial sites and to decline caudally. The entomophagous bat (Miniopterus inflatus) had a mean body mass (coefficient of variation) of 8.9 g (5%) and a mean intestinal length of 20 cm (6%). The surface area of the basic intestinal tube (primary mucosa) was 9.1 cm2 (10%) but this was amplified to 48 cm2 (13%) by villi and to 0.13 m2 (20%) by microvilli. The total number of microvilli per intestine was 4 x 10(11) (20%). The average microvillus had a diameter of 8 nm (10%), a length of 1.1 microns (22%) and a membrane surface area of 0.32 micron 2 (31%). In two species of fruit bats (Epomophorus wahlbergi and Lisonycteris angolensis), body masses were greater and intestines longer, the values being 76.0 g (18%) and 76.9 g (4%), and 73 cm (16%) and 72 cm (7%), respectively. Surface areas were also greater, amounting to 76 cm2 (26%) and 45 cm2 (8%) for the primary mucosa, 547 cm2 (29%) and 314 cm2 (16%) for villi and 2.7 m2 (23%) and 1.5 m2 (18%) for microvilli. An increase in the number of microvilli, 33 x 10(11) (19%) and 15 x 10(11) (24%) per intestine, contributed to the more extensive surface area but there were concomitant changes in the dimensions of microvilli. Mean diameters were 94 nm (8%) and 111 nm (4%), and mean lengths were 2.8 microns (12%) and 2.9 microns (10%), respectively. Thus, an increase in the surface area of the average microvillus to 0.83 micron 2 (12%) and 1.02 microns 2 (11%) also contributed to the greater total surface area of microvilli. The lifestyle-related differences in total microvillous surface areas persisted when structural quantities were normalised for the differences in body masses. The values for total microvillous surface area were 148 cm2g-1 (20%) in the entomophagous bat, 355 cm2g-1 (20%) in E. wahlbergi and 192 cm2g-1 (17%) in L. angolensis. This was true despite the fact that the insecteater possessed a greater length of intestine per unit of body mass: 22 mm g-1 (8%) versus 9-10 mm g-1 (9-10%) for the fruit-eaters.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Caviedes-Vidal, T. J. McWhorter, S. R. Lavin, J. G. Chediack, C. R. Tracy, and W. H. Karasov
The digestive adaptation of flying vertebrates: High intestinal paracellular absorption compensates for smaller guts
PNAS, November 27, 2007; 104(48): 19132 - 19137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. R. Tracy, T. J. McWhorter, C. Korine, M. S. Wojciechowski, B. Pinshow, and W. H. Karasov
Absorption of sugars in the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus): a paradox explained
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2007; 210(10): 1726 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Maina
What it takes to fly: the structural and functional respiratory refinements in birds and bats
J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2000; 203(20): 3045 - 3064.
[Abstract]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1997