QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thorn, R. S. Articles by Smith, B. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thorn, R. S. Articles by Smith, B. H.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 200, Issue 14 2045-2055, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera. III. Bilateral sensory input is necessary for induction and expression of olfactory blocking

RS Thorn and BH Smith
Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.

The associative learning phenomenon termed 'blocking' demonstrates that animals do not necessarily associate a conditioned stimulus (e.g. X) with reinforcement if X is coincident with a second conditioned stimulus (e.g. A) that had already been associated with the same reinforcement. Blocking therefore represents a tactic that animals can use to modulate associative learning in order to focus on the most predictive stimuli at the expense of novel ones. Using an olfactory blocking paradigm in the honeybee, we investigated the mechanistic basis for olfactory blocking. We show that removing input from one antenna eliminates the blocking of one odor by another. Since antennal sensory neurons only project to the ipsilateral antennal lobe in the honeybee, more central processing regions of the brain than the antennae must be crucial for establishing blocking. Further experiments show that this bilateral interaction between brain hemispheres is crucial during both the induction and the expression of blocking. This result implies that blocking involves an active inhibition of odor association and recall, and that this inhibition is mediated by a structure that spans both brain hemispheres. This interpretation is consistent with a role for identified bilateral modulatory neurons in the production of blocking.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Guerrieri, H. Lachnit, B. Gerber, and M. Giurfa Olfactory blocking and odorant similarity in the honeybee Learn. Mem., March 1, 2005; 12(2): 86 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-C. Sandoz, M. Hammer, and R. Menzel Side-Specificity of Olfactory Learning in the Honeybee: US Input Side Learn. Mem., September 1, 2002; 9(5): 337 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-C. Sandoz and R. Menzel Side-Specificity of Olfactory Learning in the Honeybee: Generalization between Odors and Sides Learn. Mem., September 1, 2001; 8(5): 286 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hosler and B. Smith Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 2000; 203(18): 2797 - 2806. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Daly and B. Smith Associative olfactory learning in the moth Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 2000; 203(13): 2025 - 2038. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D Muller, B Gerber, F Hellstern, M Hammer, and R Menzel Sensory preconditioning in honeybees J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2000; 203(8): 1351 - 1364. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B Gerber and J Ullrich No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(13): 1839 - 1854. [Abstract] [PDF]