spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deban, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deban, S.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 200, Issue 14 1951-1964, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Modulation of prey-capture behavior in the plethodontid salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii

S Deban

The hypothesis that salamander prey-capture behavior is highly stereotyped was tested in the plethodontid salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii using high-speed videography and kinematic analysis of feedings on two types of prey (waxworms and termites). The results show that E. eschscholtzii is capable of modulating the timing and magnitude of tongue and jaw movements in response to prey type. Feedings on waxworms, the larger prey, were characterized by shorter durations and higher velocities of tongue and jaw movements compared with feedings on termites, particularly in the latter portion of the feeding sequence (i.e. after prey contact). To test the hypothesis that sensory feedback through the tongue pad plays a role in modulating feeding movements in response to prey type, the ramus lingualis of the glossopharyngeal nerve (cranial nerve IX), which is known to carry sensory information from the tongue pad in salamanders, was transected bilaterally. This experimental deafferentation of the tongue pad had no effect on the degree or direction of differences in feeding kinematics across prey type. These results refute the glossopharyngeal feedback hypothesis, but are consistent with the hypothesis that E. eschscholtzii responds more vigorously to larger prey by assessing prey size visually.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. Schaerlaeken, A. Herrel, and J. J. Meyers
Modulation, individual variation and the role of lingual sensory afferents in the control of prey transport in the lizard Pogona vitticeps
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2071 - 2078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. M. Deban and U. Dicke
Activation patterns of the tongue-projector muscle during feeding in the imperial cave salamander Hydromantes imperialis
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2004; 207(12): 2071 - 2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. P. J. Sanford
Kinematic analysis of a novel feeding mechanism in the brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis (Teleostei: Salmonidae): behavioral modulation of a functional novelty
J. Exp. Biol., March 13, 2002; 204(22): 3905 - 3916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. M. Deban, J. C. O'Reilly, and K. C. Nishikawa
The Evolution of the Motor Control of Feeding in Amphibians
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2001; 41(6): 1280 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1997