QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Matheson, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Matheson, T. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 200, Issue 1 93-100, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Hindleg targeting during scratching in the locust

T Matheson

Intact locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) respond to tactile stimulation of their folded wings with rhythmic scratching movements of the ipsilateral hindleg that are directed towards the site of stimulation. For example, sites near the base of a wing elicit anteriorly directed scratches, whereas sites near the distal end of a wing elicit posteriorly directed scratches. Locusts also scratch in response to tactile stimulation of a wing that is held outstretched in a posture similar to that normally adopted during flight, but they fail to alter their leg targeting to compensate for this changed position of the stimulus site. Instead, they scratch at an empty point in space near the abdomen, where the stimulus site would have been if the wing was folded in the resting posture. This inappropriate scratching does not result from mechanical constraints on the hindleg's movement, from stimulation of abdominal sensory receptors, or from an absence of sensory information from the outstretched wing. It also persists when the metathoracic ganglion that controls movements of the hindlegs is isolated from the remainder of the central nervous system (CNS). Targeted scratching of sites on the wings of locusts therefore appears to be fixed relative to body coordinates and does not take into account alterations of the target wing's position.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Hesselberg and F.-O. Lehmann The role of experience in flight behaviour of Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2009; 212(20): 3377 - 3386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Page, J. Zakotnik, V. Durr, and T. Matheson Motor Control of Aimed Limb Movements in an Insect J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 484 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Cruse, V. Durr, and J. Schmitz Insect walking is based on a decentralized architecture revealing a simple and robust controller Phil Trans R Soc A, January 15, 2007; 365(1850): 221 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zakotnik, T. Matheson, and V. Durr Co-contraction and passive forces facilitate load compensation of aimed limb movements. J. Neurosci., May 10, 2006; 26(19): 4995 - 5007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Page and T. Matheson Wing hair sensilla underlying aimed hindleg scratching of the locust J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2004; 207(15): 2691 - 2703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Matheson and V. Durr Load compensation in targeted limb movements of an insect J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2003; 206(18): 3175 - 3186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Durr and T. Matheson Graded Limb Targeting in an Insect Is Caused by the Shift of a Single Movement Pattern J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1754 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Hiraguchi, T. Yamaguchi, and M. Takahata Mechanoreceptors involved in the hindwing-evoked escape behaviour in cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 206(3): 523 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]