spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, L.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 8 1743-1756, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Mucus entrapment of particles by a suspension-feeding tilapia (Pisces: Cichlidae)

S Sanderson, M Stebar, K Ackermann, S Jones, I Batjakas and L Kaufman

A miniature fiberoptic endoscope was used to observe the processes of particle encounter and retention inside the buccopharyngeal cavity of suspension-feeding tilapia. Small particles (38 µm to 1.0 mm in diameter) were trapped in strands and aggregates of mucus, which usually slid posteriorly on the ceratobranchials of arches I­IV towards the esophagus while the fish pumped water through the buccopharyngeal cavity. During stage 1 of periodic reversals of water flow inside the buccopharynx, mucus-bound particles usually lifted off the arch surfaces and travelled a short distance in an anterior or anterodorsal direction. During stage 2 of a reversal, the mucus usually resumed travel in a posterior or posteroventral direction and exited the field of view. Mucus was present less often during feeding on large particles (3­10 mm in diameter) than on small particles, and large particles were rarely observed to be attached to mucus. We discuss the advantages to suspension-feeding fishes of using aerosol filtration by mucus entrapment rather than sieving, and predict that many cichlid and cyprinid suspension feeders that consume bacteria and phytoplankton use mucus for aerosol filtration.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. C. Smith and S. L. Sanderson
Mucus function and crossflow filtration in a fish with gill rakers removed versus intact
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): 2706 - 2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. T. Callan and S. L. Sanderson
Feeding mechanisms in carp: crossflow filtration, palatal protrusions and flow reversals
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2003; 206(5): 883 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Summers and L. Ferry-Graham
Ventilatory modes and mechanics of the hedgehog skate (Leucoraja erinacea): testing the continuous flow model
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2001; 204(9): 1577 - 1587.
[Abstract] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1996