spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glendinning, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glendinning, J. I.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 7 1523-1534, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Is chemosensory input essential for the rapid rejection of toxic foods?

JI Glendinning
Arizona Research Laboratories, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA.

Herbivorous insects often rapidly reject foods containing toxic plant compounds. While the functional significance of this rejection response is clear, the mechanistic basis is not. The role of peripheral chemoreceptors in the rapid rejection of toxic foods was examined using a model system consisting of nicotine and the tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta), which is a pest of tobacco plants. When offered diets containing naturally occurring concentrations of nicotine, larvae initially fed readily, but abruptly stopped feeding within 30s. A high percentage of larvae also exhibited toxic responses mediated by the central nervous system (twitching and writhing) to the ingested nicotine within 30s, indicating that nicotine could have been absorbed within the same time as the rejection response. Two lines of evidence are provided against a role of peripheral chemoreceptors in this rapid rejection response. First, all mouthpart chemoreceptors were ablated from the larvae, and they were then subjected to feeding tests with diets containing either nicotine or a compound (caffeine) that is known to stimulate deterrent taste receptors in M. sexta. Whereas the ablations virtually eliminated the rejection response to caffeine, they had no measurable impact on the rejection response to nicotine. Second, sensory recordings from two important gustatory sensilla (the medial and lateral styloconica) failed to demonstrate a plausible role of sensory input from either sensillum in the rapid rejection of nicotine. The most parsimonious interpretation of these results is that the nicotine rejection response was mediated by a rapidly acting post-ingestive mechanism.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. I. Glendinning, S. Domdom, and E. Long
Selective adaptation to noxious foods by a herbivorous insect
J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3355 - 3367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Glendinning, N. Nelson, and E. Bernays
How do inositol and glucose modulate feeding in Manduca sexta caterpillars?
J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2000; 203(8): 1299 - 1315.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. I. Glendinning and T. T. Hills
Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Transduction Pathways Within a Bitter-Sensitive Taste Receptor
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 734 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1996